Yup. Keep going Walz, attack Trump over and over. That's all you need to do.

Vance is slick, but Walz is honest. I hope people can see the difference.

This is marketing word salad, which is all you can expect from someone like Vance.

Your running mate tried to refuse aid to natural disasters a few years ago to areas that didn’t rim him hard enough. Were you not paying attention?

And Vance is simply refusing to answer the question about child separation. He simply won't.

Lol.. number one export being top soil from flooding.

but Trump isn’t actually going to work to make solar panels in the US or anywhere. This is a non answer that “they haven’t solved all the problems, so we should do nothing.”

Wtf is Vance talking about? So he’s going to continue separating families, got it.

Maybe people don’t agree with you because you’re a misogynistic dipshit.

So your ex-baby mama is watching. I feel bad for her for ever having crossed your path.

Cutting both their mics was great. I want more of that, please.

Really, by getting rid of the EPA?

Ouch on the Haitian call.

Vance talking over the moderators, now. That won't play well.

hey so if vance/trump is going to have things done here instead of overseas why did trump not get that done when he was president. this is the problem (well outside all the others) with his campaign. He had his time at bat and he did not do any of these things.

Venture Capitalism! Name the monster.

Another non answer. No plan

pretty sure America has legalized slave labour via the prison system

guys I thought Walz would be doing better

Bust unions and give the rich tax breaks is the spirit animal of not just Trump, but all the GOP.

Oh shit, Tim just sunk JD's battleship.

I don't think the experts Walz was talking about and the "experts" Vance is talking about are the same experts.

Federal land? We don’t have a land problem.

I don’t know the details, but I’ll talk about identity politics instead of addressing the number 1 problem right now.

e: and loop back to the border!!

"First of all..."

Solving those things in the past! Stop worrying about the future!

In the last Canadian debate one of the questions was that if you reduce housing prices how will the elderly who own all the houses afford their retirement. I thought it was ridiculous, but it's interesting that it's not even in the discussion tonight

Vance: mah family, so relevant

So are we voting for Vance or Walz???