833

“We see it now: The hate has shifted to the trans community,” Walz said. “They see that as an opportunity. If you’re watching any sporting events right now, you see that Donald Trump’s closing arguments are to demonize a group of people for being who they are.”

“We’re out there trying to make the case that access to healthcare, a clean environment, manufacturing jobs, and keeping your local hospital open are what people are really concerned about,” he continued. “They’re running millions of dollars of ads demonizing folks who are just trying to live their lives.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago

That's cool. Like a Midwestern dad defending his kid against the people talking down to him.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 183 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm honestly heartened to hear Waltz specfically voice support for trans folk. This is opposed to Harris who said she would follow the law in regards to my community, which sounds good but I need everyone to understand that it could be said by a governor in a southern state enforcing anti trans legislation. Waltz actually went the distance to say we should to be legally left alone. There is a stark difference between these two statements, even if I glad to hear both.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.world -5 points 8 hours ago

The Harris Administration is actively trying to silence Walz's beliefs.

It's ironic because it's Walz himself that has ignited support for Harris.

So frustrating as a progressive

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 1 day ago

We're just a few weeks away from the election. The candidates have two different but important roles.

  • Presidential candidate: keep the base in line while not alienating swing voters
  • VP candidate: say things that the presidential candidate can't say

As much as you may want Harris to say something like "We will defend the trans community," it's going to alienate swing voters.

It makes no earthly sense the election is this close but it is. Kamala can't afford a misstep but Tim can.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I completely understand that and I do not fault Harris for giving a precise diplomatic answer in the Fox interview on what some voters see as a sensitive issue. Which is difficult for me to even type because the concept of my existence is a "political issue" to some.

However, I do take exception with it being characterized as "Harris announce support for trans community", because that's just not what she said. Which is why I am happy to hear Waltz clarify and go further.

[-] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

Hey, I just wanted to tell you something cause it sounds like you might be in a bad place. Even with all of the political finger pointing surrounding your identity, you need to know something very important.

Your life matters. Your experiences matter. Your feelings matter.

You matter.

Ignore all the hatred and all the fear. Ignore the bigotry and close mindedness. Ignore it all and know that there are so many people out there that will love you and support you and accept you.

You are not alone.

[-] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

We can't ignore it when they're constantly passing more and more draconian laws that make our lives infinitely harder all across the United States.

[-] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

You're correct. But i also said Ignore and not "do nothing". It's possible to ignore the hate while still fighting for your rights.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 30 points 1 day ago

Do you think swing voters might in fact be fucking morons? I'm so tired of the fate the world resting in the hands of low information people who seemingly command the memory and political acumen of the proverbial goldfish.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

No fucking shit they’re morons. But you still need their votes to win. Democracy isn’t rule by the intelligent its rule by the people regardless of their intelligence

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] kellyaster@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

Bless this man, he does appear to be the real deal. Someone please buy him a drink

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I'm on the other side of the world, and would happily chip in. Start a GoFundMe!

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Federal law prohibits contributions, donations, expenditures(including independent expenditures) and disbursements solicited, directed, received or made directly or indirectly by or from foreign nationals in connection with any federal, state or local election. So unless you know somebody with an international corporation then you cannot donate.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
833 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19077 readers
3280 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS