861
Nevar Forget (lemmy.world)
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] angelmountain@feddit.nl 27 points 22 hours ago

America's system is a problem.

[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

Yeah no shit. But 2 weeks from the election isn't the time to try to fix it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago

Most people that vote third party wouldn't vote otherwise. Assuming that every vote for Jill Stein would've gone to Hillary is quite the assumption. I always vote third party, so assuming my current vote for Jill Stein would've gone towards Harris instead is just dumb and wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

/* in countries with a broken democracy

[-] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 7 points 18 hours ago

I'll never forget what third party voting gets us; additional fucking choices beyond the dominant two-party system, encouraging broader participation. When a Republican or Democrat candidate loses any race, it's common to see them use third party candidates as a scapegoat.

[-] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 11 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Except it doesn’t. Not in presidentials anyway.

[-] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 17 hours ago

Do you vote separately for your president in the US?

In Germany we vote for Parliament, whoever receives a majority of votes then gets the governmental mandate and their candidate becomes chancellor. Many people thought there never would be any other chancellor than from either the "social" democrats (SPD) or "christian" conservatives (CDU/CSU, also just called "Union"), until 2021 when the Green Party got so good in surveys we suddenly had three official candidates.

I do know about the "electorial college" nonsense, just asking what exactly the votes are aimed to be for, government or specifically the president.

[-] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

In the United States we vote for people not party. Every ballot is different depending on the year and where you live.

This November I will vote for

  • President/VP
  • 1 of 2 US Senate seats (the other will be voted on in 2 years)
  • My US House Representative
  • My State House Representative
  • A county board seat
  • A city commissioner
  • Retention of certain judges
  • A school board seat
  • A board member for our water district

If I choose to do so I could vote for multiple political parties across the ballot. Which is great because I might agree with my local green party of local issues but still want to vote for Democrats nationally.

I would really like to see us remove the electoral college, implement RCV or STAR. And move towards more of a proportional representation system.

Edit: Also worth mentioning that how elections are run also depends on where you live. States actually control how their citizens elect a President, I believe 2 are using RCV this year. Some states also allow local communities to choose how they elect local officials.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Primary Election, 1st Vote: One vote per voter to decide who represents the political party for the presidential election. Presidential Election, 2nd Vote: One vote per voter to decide who becomes the US President. The Electoral College and the stupid point system allows the minority vote to win. Yes, there are more names on the ballot for local government positions too. Technically, one could mix their votes with Democrat, Republican and other party candidates on the ballot.

I prefer the German voting system because it is based on the majority vote. FYI, I am allowed to vote in both Germany and USA.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Do you vote separately for your president in the US?

Yes, because they're the president not the prime minister(which is Speaker of the House in the US)

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 17 hours ago

Hey, just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it won't.

  • a terrible gambler
[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago

Ahh the illusion of choice. You vote third party and get another Trump presidency, but hey at least you got your morals, eh?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cmeu@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

Every one so excited to back the lesser of two evils and wondering why things are the way they are

[-] scops@reddthat.com 243 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Stein wasn't even the only third party candidate stealing votes. I voted for Gary Johnson with the Libertarian party as a "protest vote". Glancing at national results, he had almost three times as many votes as Stein did.

I was 100% the moron this meme is targeted towards. I voted for Harris yesterday.

[-] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 7 points 18 hours ago

Third party voting; the really real reason Democrats and Republicans can't get their candidates elected. lol

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 20 points 23 hours ago

Me too Stein in 2016. I was so mad at Clinton for what they did to Sanders. I am voting Harris as soon as voting is open here.

Bernie deserved so much better, and I fucking hate the way the 2016 democrats fucked him over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago

But you aren’t a moron if you learned from your mistakes. It means the opposite.

I wish we had ranked choice voting. Then these protest votes would still work and not screw with the system so bad and we could fight the stranglehold of the two party system.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Me looking at the current state of our democracy and political system. 🤷

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Electing a felon certainly can't make it worse. It is not like he is fantasizing about deploying the national guard against his own citizens.... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/17/donald-trump-enemy-within-quote/75714201007/

[-] yemmly@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago

I voted for Harris yesterday, and I’ll be voting for Harris again tomorrow. Just kidding. Turns out the dead person whose identity I stole wasn’t registered to vote. 😞

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 42 points 23 hours ago

You make jokes, but tomorrow this comment will be on FOX as proof them libs are cheating...

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Well, they read it in a forum where anybody can write anything, so it must be true. They are truly the best at fair and balanced ripoartign.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Picture a situation where various political parties vie to unseat the Republicans. With more representative electoral systems, voters could select their preferred candidates, while still counting their vote against the Republican party even if their choice doesn’t win, all without the spoiler effect. Since voting methods are set at the state level, we don’t need to wait for federal reforms; some states have already enacted electoral changes. For instance, Alaska recently chose a more moderate conservative over Sarah Palin due to Ranked Choice voting.

Who would oppose having multiple opportunities to diminish Republican power? The Democratic Party would. In blue states, they could replace First Past The Post voting with a system that eliminates the spoiler effect. Yet, year after year, election after election, Democrats remain inactive on passing state level electoral reform in the states they control.

Republicans are moving to protect FPTP voting in red states. Why do the democrats want to use the voting system republicans prefer?

Its not that democrats dont know about the flaws in the voting system either. Just mention voting for a third party to any Democrat, and they’ll readily acknowledge the weaknesses of the voting system. Comments about the Green Party here will further illustrate their understanding of this issue.

If democrats understanding the problem, yet refuse to fix it, can only mean one thing. The Democrats prefer the country balancing over a fire pit of fascism rather than truly competing for our votes. They would rather this country be lost to authoritarianism then to play on a even playing field.

Party over country at all costs.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago

Also, the 2000 Presidential election results in Florida:

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

If you don’t like stein, consider voting party for socialism and liberation instead.

They’re running Claudia de la Cruz on a platform of Palestinian statehood and an end to arms shipments to israel.

I found out recently that they’re on the ballot or have official write in status in 42 states, so unless you’re in Alaska, Nevada, Montana, South Dakota, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Georgia or Pennsylvania go for it!

E: forgot Nevada. They’re not officially recognized in Nevada.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
861 points (84.9% liked)

Political Memes

5357 readers
4073 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS