699
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

A video encouraging women to vote independently for Kamala Harris sparked outrage among conservative men, who called it divisive and “amoral.” The video highlights the gender gap that has widened between Harris and Trump, with recent polls showing notable leads by Harris among women and Trump among men.

Critics like Charlie Kirk labeled it “nauseating,” criticizing the wife for lying to “her sweet husband who probably works his tail off to make sure that she can go and have a nice life and provides for the family.”

Supporters argue it reflects real tensions around women’s autonomy, especially in conservative households.

(page 2) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sooo if you're a potential husband with a penis, vote for Trump for the following reasons:

  1. Guaranteed husbandry or at least fatherhood. Just go out there and fuck someone, they gotta have the kid no matter what. Your cum is valuable.

  2. Ah yes. You think I forget? You can grab them by the pussy....if you're famous. So go out there, fuck somebody, be famous and grab them by the pussy!

3)Earn a second vote. You heard me right. You can't incriminate each other and therefore her vote is your vote.

Now go out there and vote! Vote Trump! Fight the enemy within. It's just not right! Bikini at the pool and allowed to vote? Heck no! Women should be prepared for being attached to a 4x4 in the bedroom permanently for the sole purpose of making love to the man. And sometimes for having babies, but hurry up with that, and don't feed babies breast milk at the park. And those naked things that happen in California the gay, Oregon and the independent country of Washington State, those gotta go!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TotalFat@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

they cannot say they did not see it coming after the loud royal fucking theyve been crowing about for so long

[-] LilDestructiveSheep@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I thought voting is done in secret.. if they rage about that simple topic, you gotta know who not to vote

[-] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I know who my wife is voting for, but even if she voted differently, I would love her the same. It would hurt if she lied about it though, because it would imply a lack of trust.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Are there really that many people lonely enough to put up with being married to a Trump supporter when they don't also drink that trad wife koolaid?

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

It was a goofy thing to do, that probably made it harder for all the women out there in relationships like this. Every woman knew she could do this, but now because Jimbo saw this ad, he's that much more likely to beat the shit out of her to get her to confess how she voted because she smiled wrong when she walked away from the booth.

I think it was a bad move.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Even more reason for these women to independently vote for Kamala Harris. F Jimbo.

[-] tupalos@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Nah bro. It sparked more women to think for themselves and vote for Kamala

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Of course, how could I be so dense? Women can't think for themselves unless a commercial tells them to do it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
699 points (98.7% liked)

News

25122 readers
1930 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS