671
submitted 5 days ago by dl007@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 117 points 5 days ago

Pretty sure the user experience folk are screaming for a path to be built there but are getting ignored.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 38 points 5 days ago

They aren't being ignored. The corner needs to be a right angle for compliance reasons.

[-] madjo@feddit.nl 19 points 5 days ago

But the actual corner isn't even a right angled corner.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 30 points 5 days ago

They were forced to cut corners in implementation.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Everyone says, they are not bringing their best angles. Triangles. Quadrangles. And some I assume are acute angles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

What we should do is put chainlink fence around the corner, but make the part that the users loved the most accessible with a monthly pass that they can only walk on with shoes purchased at the university store.

- spez

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

You mod 16 subs, what do you get?

Another day blocking API requests.

Saint Peter don’t DM me cuz I can’t go.

I owe my soul to Spez’s asshole.

[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 22 points 5 days ago

It's important we do it that way for our 🌟brand identity🌟.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Management wants us to add more AI and Machine Learning so the user ends up in the parking lot.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

How about a pond?

[-] mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world 71 points 5 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 87 points 5 days ago

A lot of universities with large campus grounds take the approach of observing the natural foot traffic wear patterns on grassy areas, and then build walkways where the most worn down parts are.

Its... pretty obvious.

If everyone is taking an alternate, non designed path... your design sucks, modify it to facilitate what people find more effective.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago
[-] pageflight@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

And there's a whole community for them! Not sure how to link to it though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 5 days ago

iirc it's what they did in central park. Don't create paths and later pave the desire paths that show up

[-] RoabeArt@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They did this in a park by my house. It used to have a long paved path that meandered through some woods. Engineers with the city noticed the shortcut that people were cutting through, and realized that most people didn't care for the long path. Apparently some anonymous person or several had been dumping gravel along the shortcut for traction and to make it less muddy. So the city paved the shortcut, and removed the long path so that nature would reclaim it.

Democracy in action.

It was kind of sad though to lose the long path because I liked walking through there, especially during the fall, but if it means having less maintenance machines going in there every week to pollute the place (lawnmowers, asphalt patching, etc) then so be it.

[-] zante@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 days ago

Don’t underestimate youthful rebellion!

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Routhinator@startrek.website 58 points 5 days ago

Designers need to wake up and realize their job is to understand what the user wants not what they saw in a wet dream.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Not a universal rule, however. Theres the whole concept of "optimizing yourself out of the fun" and what not in video games. Or the hardships being part of what makes a game fulfilling. It depends on what your goal is

[-] pfm@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 4 days ago

Wake up Nee-Oh!

[-] grue@lemmy.world 72 points 5 days ago

Whenever that happens, the design is wrong.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 44 points 5 days ago

Fixed. Added a wall with razor wire on top to prevent this.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago
[-] superkret@feddit.org 18 points 5 days ago

In IT, sometimes there's security reasons for the designed detour.
But then good design would completely obstruct the shortcut from the user's view.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

change log: We've adjusted the 20 year old UI to better reflect modern aesthetic trends that our new hires learned in school.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 42 points 5 days ago

I, unfortunately, have to use GitHub at $DAYJOB and this is me. I navigate most of the webpage via the URL bar now.

Basically, let's say I'm working on a repo github.com/tomato/sauce/ and want to navigate to the Releases page.

Via the webpage:

  1. Type github.com into the URL bar.
  2. Don't find tomato/sauce/ in the list of recent repos, even though it's the only repo I work on.
  3. Click on some other repo that's at least in the tomato/ org.
  4. Navigate up to the tomato/ org.
  5. Find the sauce/ repo in the list.
  6. Traverse half the fucking screen to hit the "Releases" heading in the middle of the About-section.

Via the Firefox URL bar:

  1. Type gi→t→s→r→.
  2. Hit Enter.

I admit, it's hard to compete with the latter, but I wouldn't know how to navigate that way, if the former wasn't so terrible.

[-] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

What kind of sicko try to find their repos from the recent list on the main page??

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 5 days ago

Hopefully somebody else $DAYJOBs at GitHub and will see this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 24 points 5 days ago
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

"What the user needed" / "What management demanded"

[-] sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 5 days ago
[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 days ago

What the shit happened to that tree's shadow?

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago

Probably the tree is shadowing the same area that a window in or near the building the picture is being taken from is illuminating.

[-] NaturalViber@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Also, why is this shadow off from the others

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

that's just perspective, they're only parallel when looking for a perfectly top-down angle

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] whithom@discuss.online 9 points 5 days ago

That’s right, it goes in the square hole.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
671 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32476 readers
604 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS