21
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But if you paddle a little bit on the left side, then paddle a little bit on the right side, you keep going right down the middle.

Ummm...That's not how your supposed to paddle a canoe. I know this is just an analogy, but if you have to say, "It's just an analogy, stop taking it so literally," it's not a very good analogy!

For anyone who might not know, only amateurs rely purely on switching sides. Even novices taking their first lesson will be taught the j-stroke so they don't waste time switching sides constantly. I wonder if this analogy could be extended to the j-stroke and the energy wasted by constantly switching sides?

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s assuming that the point of all this is to move forward as efficiently as possible. In fact, the analogy works all the more because switching sides is less efficient, but gives the impression to untrained eyes of going down the middle.

I don’t canoe, but it sounds like the j-stroke serves its analogical purpose too. It’s when you want to be seen as being on the left (or the right), but, unbeknownst to the untrained eye, you’re paddling in such a way as to counteract being on the left, so that you actually end up going down the middle.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, this take is so cynical, but I like it!

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

haha, I didn't mean for it to sound cynical. "Moving forward as efficiently as possible" isn't necessarily always good. Not all shores are worth reaching. In a representative democracy, politicians often paddle on both sides to appeal to the median voter.

It reminds me of the line by the ancient Athenian statesman Solon: "No more good must be attempted than the nation can bear".

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think it absolutely can be extended. Just keep paddling to the left while making corrections to ensure you’re headed where you want to go

[-] detalferous@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

If the meaning of the analogy is clear to a general audience, then criticizing the analogy based on technical details like this is silly.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't realize canoeing was so obscure to an American general audience, but I guess my Canadian is showing. I don't think it's "technical details" when I've seen overseas tourists see a canoe for the first time ever and after a 15-minute lesson, executing j-strokes.

It's like a politician using the "bowling theory" (I assume most Americans are familiar with bowling) and describes that theory as, "It's like bowling. You want to keep both hands on the ball to gently guide it towards it's target." Basically any first timer should be throwing the ball with one hand (with a few exception in those too young/disabled/etc.) to get the best results.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you assume everyone can afford canoe lessons, that comes across as pretty entitled to those of us who don't have expendable income like that.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Where I live, most public school students will at some point in their education will go on a (free) field trip to a nature preserve or national/provincial park which often includes canoeing. Even in downtown Toronto, there's a notable push to expose students to nature and they've been bussing classes out of the city for a day.

I don't know, maybe I'm just lucky (though I wouldn't say entitled), that paddling around in a canoe/kayak is pretty normalized. I looked up some rentals around me and they were <$50 for a full day. Of course some can't afford that, but it feels like a pretty good value for a full day of family activity.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Canoe theory: never stand.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
21 points (88.9% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3582 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS