205

Summary

JD Vance claimed pro-Ukraine protesters harassed him and his daughter in Cincinnati, but demonstrators say they merely passed him en route to a protest.

Video shows a civil exchange where Vance defended U.S. withdrawal from Ukraine aid, contradicting Trump’s stance on Russia’s invasion.

Critics accused Vance of using his child to deflect backlash over his role in a heated Oval Office meeting with Zelensky.

Protests against his Ukraine policy continue as Russia escalates attacks, with demonstrations held in Washington, D.C., and Europe.

(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Vance is a verified unabashed fucking liar.

Where’s the proof this happened? Where was his secret service detail?

Remember his fabricated story about Haitians in Ohio? I call Bullshit 💩

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure you can see his security detail in the video. Most of the people seem to be elderly, shuffling around and you hear someone off-camera asking questions.

He's a fucking baby. If any of these grandmas suddenly had a notion of doing something violent, I'm sure "JD" "Vance" would have been just fine...

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

And it should happen every time he leaves his house or goes outside.

If he uses his 3 y/o as a sheild that's just more pathetic

[-] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Sucks to suck

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Using his own kids as a political prop, of course.

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I really don't need to know how old his couch cushion is tbh...

[-] sloppychops@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Boys' night out at the local strip club, he turns up at Ikea wondering where everyone is.

[-] Aliktren@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No he knows just a little how ukrainian parents feel every day

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, he really does not, not in any way. Or if he does, he doesn't care. He's a soulless, power-mad sociopath, with no more human feeling than a cockroach has.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sucks to suck, maybe you should think about consequences before becoming a nazi.
Oh and he even pulled out the "use my daughter as sympathy bait" card. Classic snowflake!

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Imagine you and your family being confronted by a Russian conscript who shoots anything that moves.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I hope they were armed to the teeth and you piss your bed from nightmares for the rest of your pathetic life.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You can see the video. It seems like an extremely mild bunch of people asking him questions he was uncomfortable about.

He's just whining. I'm remembering how the qons were acting like it was 9/11 2.0 when Huckabee was....checks notes....denied a fucking cheese plate at a restaurant that didn't want to be seen endorsing these monsters.

I also remember something in the first little d term where some con was joined on the sidewalk, and people around him walked along with him, asking questions he didn't like. He acted like he was this close to be abducted by terrorists. I can't remember if that was Tucker or what, but it was some right wing douche clutching their pearls over a big fucking nothing.

[-] RebelSquare42@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Wow if that’s how upset he is over a potential minor emotional trauma for his child I wonder how he would feel about her living in Ukraine under bombings?

[-] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Aw poor baby. You cannot convince me that this chubby man child doesn’t wear eyeliner

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

not a good enough protest if he can talk about it

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 1 week ago

douches gonna douche. douche. douche. and cocksuckers gonna suck. suck. suck.

[-] pinheadednightmare@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

❄️❄️❄️❄️

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

he is such a try hard. What a douchy loser.

[-] parody@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

Hey does anybody know whose kid is in the stroller and how old they are? Guessing between maybe 2-4 years old, and prob with a father who wasn’t exactly leading his best life as protestors impugned his integrity (not simply debated genuine views), but who knows

https://youtu.be/_FRXD7aG3XU

I’ll watch again and try to use context clues to figure this out… maybe someone mentions the age

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Just Fucking Dumb should think about the 3-year old Ukrainian children dealing with the shit from Russia.

[-] Curmudge_john@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 week ago

"Don't hit him he got kids with him my apologies"

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, get used to it maybe

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
205 points (96.8% liked)

politics

22011 readers
1926 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS