384
submitted 6 days ago by DeadWorld@lemm.ee to c/brainworms@lemm.ee
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 29 points 4 days ago

So they wouldn’t let ICE inside their house to search for the grandmother, correct?

And then days later, ICE suddenly decides that the mom and granddaughter have “gang ties”, correct?

Riiiiiiiiight. Having “gang ties” is now the equivalent of cops planting a crack pipe on you.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 73 points 5 days ago

The government said that Berrios’ apprehension was driven in part because she is an associate of the violent gang MS-13, which has Salvadoran roots.

According to the current regime and their brownshirts, everyone with either Latin family or with a Latin name is associated with a violent gang, and they don't bother to demonstrate it in court.

This is exactly the hell we've been trying to prevent for fifty years, and failed.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 29 points 5 days ago

This is sadly also getting to be familiar:

“No, it’s false. My mother, she works really hard since she was really little, and she never had anything to do with gangs or anything like that,” Cruz Berrios said during a recent interview on CNN, adding that her mother came to the U.S. in part to flee gang activity.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This is exactly the hell we’ve been trying to prevent for fifty years, and failed.

The whole project of liberalism -- the idea that we could slowly reform American institutions instead of upend them -- has failed. On anything close to the current path we will see no meaningful action on climate change, no significant redistribution of ill-gotten gains, and no lasting checks on the ability of the state to carry out the type of arbitrary brutality that's the focus of this article.

It's time to think about which radical changes need to be made most urgently, and demanding those changes as a prerequisite to supporting whatever political leaders or movements emerge.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago

Notice this always happens in states without constitutional carry.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 5 days ago

Drawing a weapon would have only gotten them perforated. No this warrants a few pounds of C4 and the willingness to die to set an example.

Most people aren't willing to make such a commitment, even though all our lives are forfeit at this point.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

You say this as if it is easy/possible for most people to:

  1. Acquire C4
  2. Safely store it in their vehicle without arousing suspicions of their family and friends
  3. be able to detonate it at a moment’s notice but never accidentally.
[-] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 6 points 5 days ago

I think they were more referring to taking action like a oklahoma city type thing. It's nearly as ridiculous to set up c4 in your car for this scenario as the people who keep guns by the bed and masturbate to the thought of a home invasion.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Difficult, but my point was that if we're going to respond with violence, guns will be not very effective. But there are other ways that will be.

ETA C4 is actually stable enough to be safely stowed, and is very hard to accidentally detonate. Typically we civilians have to resort to dynamite or homemade explosive compounds which deteriorate and are less reliable, either discharging when they shouldn't or failing to when they should.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
384 points (99.7% liked)

BrainWorms

1511 readers
33 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS