11
submitted 1 month ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Probably going to get downvoted for this, but this just makes kids look for VPN's and other ways to skirt this restriction. It may make VPN's less useful for the rest of us as a result when certain services are forced to comply with the law, breaking those services for those of us using VPN's. It sounds like a great idea but I don't know that the implementation will make a noticeable or effective difference.

[-] cybermass@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Most kids are not going to pay a subscription for a VPN, I don't think that would be as big of an issue as you think.

[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, they're gonna download "free vpns" and get infected with malware and turn their device into part of a bot net.

Or use Tor and end up finding things worse than just "social media".

Are the government gonna ban those too?

Congrats, you now live in China where the all benevolent government have 24/7 surveillance to keep you safe.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There are free VPNs that are subsidized by payers and are legit (though most are not). Calyx and Proton to name two.

Also Tor is free, and the most popular site on the darknet is Facebook, so I dont think you're informed about the nature of Tor traffic.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Also here, where a VPN or proxy is a "must" for using the internet normally, there are also some ran by charities. But yeah, the omnipresence of shady free VPNs is very concerning.

[-] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Just because it isn't perfect it doesn't mean it's useless.

Just because there is no way to stop 100% of all crime it doesn't mean taking measures to reduce crime is futile.

There is a lot more to this than just blocking the site. It will also change social norms. Right now, if a 14 year old as social media, nobody bats an eye; but with the 16 year requirement, through all the sudden, parents aren't too comfortable with letting their 14 year old have social media. So not only will they need to find some free VPN totally not spyware to use (and even know that that exists and how to use), they will also have to hide it from their parents, as it is no longer socially acceptable for 14 year olds to have social media.

And before you say "Kids can easily get a free VPN and hide it." Never underestimate tech illiteracy.

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The thing about kids getting a VPN, free or paid is that it will spread like wild fire. It only takes one kid who knows how to do something. They tried this at my highschool, blocking websites and such. That was more than 20 years ago and we knew how to use VPN's or similar then and once we figured it out it was an open secret.

I'm not saying the law shouldn't exist or that we should do nothing. I'm saying that this isn't going to be effective as it is and could end up leading to worse things.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60135 readers
1539 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS