736
submitted 2 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

President Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, reversing his prior stance against using executive clemency.

The pardon covers Hunter’s federal gun conviction and tax evasion guilty plea, sparking political controversy.

Biden cited political attacks and a “miscarriage of justice” as reasons for his decision, emphasizing his son’s recovery from addiction and the targeting of his family.

Critics argue the move undermines the judicial process, while supporters view it as within Biden’s constitutional powers.

This decision shields Hunter from potential prison time as Biden nears the end of his presidency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

And?

You gonna leave your son in prison while a criminal president who explicitly stated he'd target his political opponents sits in the Oval Office?

Republicans just blatantly lied their way into total power and you're over here whining about a Democrat lying about getting his son out of prison for non-violent crimes on his way out of office?

Your priorities are utterly fucked.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I can simultaneously "whine" about multiple things. I guess I am talented at "whining".

Also, this kind of shit is part of the reason why that orange won in the first place. Democrats putting up a marginally better candidate and pretending to be saviors of the Earth.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The calories you burned typing your complaint about Biden pardoning Hunter are wasted calories. It's so irrelevant and small compared to the avalanche of bullshit we've already dealt with and will be dealing with for the foreseeable future, that it's comical to even consider. The fact that Trump made it abundantly clear he'd be targeting his political opponents is all the justification needed for Biden to pardon Hunter.

And no, Democrats putting up a "marginally" better candidate is not how the orange dipshit won. First of all, a successful prosecutor with a doctorate in law and a significant political resume isn't "marginally" better than a twice impeached convicted felon and rapist who instigated a violent insurrection and illegally attempted to overturn an election. I don't know what dimension someone has to live in to think there's only a "marginal" difference there. Secondly, the orange dipshit is president because Americans are STUPID. Because Americans don't do their homework. Americans don't lookup voting histories so they can see that Democrats are way better about voting in favor of the working class. They don't look up the conviction histories to find out Democrats have WAY, WAY less convicted criminals who have served in their ranks than Republicans. Americans don't grasp that you aren't just voting for the person, but the party. Donald Trump is president....again....because Americans are STUPID. Not because Democrats are only "marginally" better.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The calories you burned

Meh, I can use fewer calories.

Americans are STUPID

Can't argue there.

Americans don't grasp that you aren't just voting for the person, but the party.

You literally vote for specific people in the US, unlike in many countries where you vote for parties. That's the whole point of your incredibly flawed representatives system. Saying people should vote Harris because of her party is like saying people should buy the terrible and useless apple vision because other apple products are good.

a successful prosecutor with a significant political resume

To most people, those sound like red flags, not advantages.

convicted felon and rapist who instigated a violent insurrection and illegally attempted to overturn an election

I mean, yeah. Americans are stupid. But then again, why should anyone believe those accusations if democrats argue lying is perfectly fine and not an issue?

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

You literally vote for specific people in the US, unlike in many countries where you vote for parties. That’s the whole point of your incredibly flawed representatives system. Saying people should vote Harris because of her party is like saying people should buy the terrible and useless apple vision because other apple products are good.

If you don't think a party gains power by their represenative becoming president, I'm not really sure how to proceed with explaining it to you.

To most people, those sound like red flags, not advantages.

Refer to my comment about Americans being STUPID. Then check her resume. She spent A LOT of time going after assholes that made people's lives harder.

why should anyone believe those accusations

Because they aren't accusations. They are facts. And facts matter. Not to stupid Americans, but to some people out there in the world.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Because they aren't accusations. They are facts.

Unfortunately, most people are neither omniscient, nor willing to spend large (or any) amounts of time to figure out what are the facts in a sea of lies from both sides.

"Hey, I can vote for one of two liars, both supporting genocide. Well, I guess I will vote for the one whose party doesn't insist I should be ashamed for being born white and/or male." - What I imagine lost democrats the election.

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
736 points (97.9% liked)

News

23616 readers
3535 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS