404
Rupert Murdoch loses battle to control succession to his media empire
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
404 points (99.5% liked)
News
35735 readers
1138 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Uh... what. Yes they do. Where on earth did you get the idea they don't?
Being too rich to have to worry about money spares you a shitload of stress and anxiety.
As does being too amoral to worry about how your actions affect other people.
They probably don't get ZERO stress and anxiety, but they get so little compared to regular people as well as access to top notch healthcare and the best food that it's literally not unusual for them to live at least a decade longer as a result.
Yeah, I won't argue that these sociopaths don't have lives that cause them to be particularly stressed or anxious. Probably should have just assumed that.
We're talking about the pop culture definition of someone who feels no shame, and just takes the most direct path no matter how fucked up it is.
So, yeah, I understand what you're saying.
But can we maybe start calling these people monsters because of the choices they make, not because of a disability they may or may not have? The popular idea that being a sociopath automatically turns you into the lovechild of a heartless CEO and jack the ripper (with a dash of narcissist mother in law) is just... wrong. There are plenty of sociopaths out there in the world trying really hard to fit in to society and who by any regular measure aren't bad people. Hell on top of that, it's a spectrum disorder - plenty of sociopaths out there can feel affection for other people, it's just harder for them to do than the average.
I guess it's just kind of tiresome to constantly be scapegoated as to why these people are awful. "Oh, they must be sociopaths, that's why they're like this". No, listen, they're like this because they are awful people. Being a sociopath makes it easier to be an awful person, but the guilt still lies with them and the choices they make, not because a disability made them like this or some sort of genetic fatalism.
Hmm, I get where you're coming from. I get the same way when people misuse PTSD. I'll try to find a better way to state it next time.
++, i think i need to rewatch Killing eve