544
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

U.S. CEOs and business executives are alarmed as Donald Trump remains firm on imposing high tariffs on U.S. allies, despite warnings from economists about potential economic harm.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump’s late-night social media announcements have blindsided both his advisers and business leaders, leaving them scrambling to react.

While Trump consults some advisers, like Marco Rubio and Treasury pick Scott Bessent, his unilateral approach limits their influence.

The uncertainty has left business leaders struggling to find ways to alter his stance on trade policies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago

Well shit. I hoped it was just bluster, but if he's serious it makes a lot of sense.

The 0.1% gain wealth whenever economies crash. He is obviously going to try to crash the world economy so fat cats can buy assets for pennies on the dollar, including entire developing nations. Then the fed prints a gazillion dollars and bails it all out.

Greedy pigs get fatter, the rest of us get leaner.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

I hoped it was just bluster

You understand he was president before, right? And that he did this before? Like, he's a totally known quantity, and he's going back to where he was in 2019.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 year ago

this dude killed 300,000 americans and people are somehow surprised that he's unbothered by the prospect of killing untold vast swaths of people now that it's been demonstrated that he will never be held accountable for his actions

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

No, I had no idea he was president before. Thank you.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nobody in the US is going to be making money when everyone else calls Trump's bluff and slaps a 200 percent exit tariff on goods to the US.

So a 1,000 dollar item will be 3,000 dollars when it hits US Customs and jump to 6,000 there because of Trump's import tariffs. They can support that all day long because they just hand the money straight back to their domestic company. As far as they're concerned they made a 3,000 dollar sale.

You might think we could just do without and use domestic manufacturing. But not only have we fucked domestic manufacturing in so many ways, this will apply to our food imports as well. So it's not like we can just refuse to pay.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

As much as the farm subsidies have been criticized, literally starving isn't something we should have to worry much about.

Food we can do domestically just fine, as long as you don't care about coffee and tea. Even those I just expect we're going to make existing grounds/leaves stretch a whole lot farther.

I don't think it'll be as bad as some of Russia's hard times, but goddamn is that a long, long way to fall.

I'm more concerned about world politics. We're going to cede a hell of a lot of control of the world to Russia and China. It's likely that China claims an entire vertical slice of the Earth, standing in the way of a good chunk of world trade.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Nobody in the US is going to be making money when everyone else calls Trump’s bluff

Categorically false.

Manufacturers will not make money. Importers will not make money.

Owners WILL make money. Mark my words.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The owners of what? Everything in the US is going to skyrocket in price. If they're a domestic company then their inputs are going to kill them.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

The Peter Theils, the Blackrocks, various equity firms.

Just like wall street doesn't mirror main street, crashing economies can be quite profitable if you're in the right industry.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I see you're talking about them buying everything they can. That's going to be kind of hard when the stock market crashes though. While it can remain irrational, it cannot ignore companies collapsing.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

John Pauson, Pauson & Co.

Made billions during '07-08

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's cute that you think that was a crash. It could have been one but they stopped it. They were able to stop it because businesses were still viable under it all. These tariffs run the real risk of making the businesses non viable which takes the base of the stock market out. A true crash that wipes everything out.

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
544 points (98.4% liked)

News

36412 readers
668 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS