2
What if solving interstellar travel isn't about figuring out faster than light propulsion, but how to extend our own lives? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by danhab99@lemmy.world to c/askscience@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So I was day dreaming and I caught a thought. What if what we understand about physics is actually all there is to understand? What if you objectively cannot move faster than the speed of light because you can't do the time traveling things necessary. This would mean that the only way to travel amongst the stars would be to extend our lives so that a 5000 year trip at the speed of light would represent like 10% of our lifespans. Travel would be attainable but like the way it was when we were sailing ships to the new world.

That's just one practical solution I could think of to stellar travel. Does anyone else have a practical idea?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TauZero@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

You are behind the times on physics advancements buddy! Thanks to the recently discovered concept of relativistic time dilation, a 5000 light year trip at the speed of light will take literally 0 seconds of your lifespan. More practically, travelling in a starship that accelerates at 1G to the halfway point, turns around and decelerates to the destination, you can reach ridiculous distances within a single human lifetime:

shipboard time distance earth time
1 year .263 LY 1.05 Y
2 years 1.13 LY 2.37 Y
3 years 2.82 LY 4.35 Y
4 years 5.80 LY 7.50 Y
5 years 10.9 LY 12.7 Y
10 years 166 LY 168 Y
15 years 2199 LY 2201 Y
20 years 28.8 kLY 28.8 kY
25 years 380 kLY 380 kY
50 years 149 GLy 149 GY
100 years 22.8 ZLy 22.8 ZY

This is the formula to calculate the distance and time:

x(τ) = c**2/a [cosh(τ a/c) - 1]
t(τ) = c/a sinh(τ a/c)

a = 9.8 m/s
c = 3e8 m/s

The formula is hyperbolic, which is why travel distance is not a linear relation of travel time. E.g. given τ = 10 years:

x = 3e8**2/9.8 * (cosh(60*60*24*365*10/2 * 9.8/3e8) - 1) * 2 / (3e8 * 60*60*24*365)
  = 166 light years
t = 3e8/9.8 * sinh(60*60*24*365*10/2 * 9.8/3e8) * 2 / (60*60*24*365)
  = 168 years
[-] calhoon2005@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

But what about the bit about not hitting anything whilst travelling at that speed? Even a speck of space dust would do massive damage at those speeds, right?

[-] TauZero@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, it's like flying the wrong way down the tube of the Large Hadron Collider. The tougher challenge though is like @MuThyme@lemmy.world said maintaining 1G acceleration. Following the rocket equation, which is logarithmic, a 50 year multi-stage rocket will be bigger than the universe itself, even if you use some kind of nuclear propulsion 10000 times more efficient than our chemical rockets.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Science

8634 readers
1 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.

Community Rules

Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.

Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.

Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.

Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.

Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.

Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.

Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.

Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.

Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.

By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
sabbah@lemmy.world
AradFort@lemmy.world
ken_cleanairsystems@lemmy.sdf.org
count_of_monte_carlo@lemmy.world