444
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Germany accused Elon Musk of trying to influence its February 2024 election by endorsing the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) through social media posts and a commentary in Welt am Sonntag.

Musk praised the AfD’s positions on regulation and taxes, calling them Germany’s saviors.

His actions sparked backlash, with opposition leader Friedrich Merz calling it unprecedented interference and SPD leader Saskia Esken vowing to resist influence from wealthy elites.

The Welt editor who published Musk’s piece resigned, while the AfD, polling second, remains shunned by mainstream parties.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago
[-] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz -2 points 1 year ago

As much as I'd love to see this happen: For which legal reason?

[-] Mateoto@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The EU has strict content moderation laws that Twitter currently violates, which Elon explicitly ignores. The EU could take actions based on the same principles that Brazil did.

[-] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Dunno about legalese, but maybe along the lines of election interference?

[-] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I doubt it's election interference when he simply posts his opinion online, if that were to get censored, as much as I'd like to censor Musk, I'd be deeply worried about what else could be censored (especially when the AfD is in power)

[-] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Afaiu the AfD are considered Nazis, which just haven't been banned yet.
While I do have issues with censorship I see necessary limits of freedom of speech and applying that to Nazis and their allies is very much within these limits in my opinion.
Inhumanity deserves no forum nor freedom of speech.

[-] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not fully familiar with the AfD but if they were Nazis they'd already be illegal (being a Nazi is illegal in Germany and a few other countries). From what I know they're just your usual far-right populist pro-russian anti-eu party, which sadly isn't enough to stop them legally.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 1 year ago

They are Nazis, plain and simple. Unfortunately, it's not quite that easy banning an entire political party, even if they're considered actively hostile towards the constitution. Well. I say "unfortunately" but it should of course be difficult. Democracy isn't easy.

[-] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So maybe not the whole of AfD can be called Nazi, but at least one of their leaders according to https://www-hessenschau-de.translate.goog/politik/demonstranten-duerfen-afd-politiker-bjoern-hoecke-als-nazi-bezeichnen-v1,ermittlungen-hoecke-ist-ein-nazi-eingesellt-100.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=de&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp:

The Frankfurt public prosecutor's office has dropped proceedings against a demonstrator who called Björn Höcke a "Nazi" during anti-AfD protests. This was not a criminal insult, but a "value judgment based on facts," according to the investigators.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago

maybe not the whole of AfD can be called Nazi,

And as we all know, if there are 9 people and 1 Nazi sitting together at a table, then there are 10 Nazis sitting together at that table.

[-] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment.

[-] ceiphas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The due process to ban the AfD was already started, but won't conclude before the election

this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
444 points (98.5% liked)

News

35754 readers
716 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS