230
submitted 1 year ago by Chozo@kbin.social to c/technology@beehaw.org

At least, some of the recent controversies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] andrew@radiation.party 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Re: Madison, she sprinkled a bunch of non-issues (edit: I don't mean to downplay the more serious issues she raises! I'm concerned that this would leave room for others to do so) or things that are normal for companies that aren’t super huge- the journal/lined paper debacle for example. Of course the company focused on profit is going to ask you to make do with essentially the same thing. That’s super normal.

Being asked to manage the OF despite objections isn’t super bad when you are literally hired just to do social media. It’s unpleasant, but most jobs are going to have unpleasant moments. At a similar pay scale, I’ve been required to go into homes where folks had COVID. Coworkers have been shot at. I’ve seen things I really would have preferred not to. No job is perfectly sane in that sense.

Some of the issues where Madison said “they wanted me to do x and I couldn’t because y” (red footage editing/ram comes to mind) feel like issues where she would be told something, then would vent in her head instead of going “hey, I don’t have enough ram to edit that footage!” - something I’ve encountered a ton with less experienced (in a business sense, not skill) hires.

The managerial and behavioral issues she brings up are awful but not entirely surprising given the type of folk who stick around there. It indicates a systemic issue and that usually happens due to a lack of oversight and course-correction, or outright malicious management. I’m hopeful that it’s the former.

Last but not least, she repeatedly states it was her dream job. This is an experience that should hopefully show her to never meet your heroes! Dream jobs usually suck unless you get lucky, because they have lots of rough edges. Hopefully she’s doing something that brings her more joy now.

[-] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 year ago

You can't force a woman to manage an OF account against her will, knowing VERY WELL what she'll be exposed to. That's fucked up.

[-] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Why "a woman" specifically? And how would that be against her will?

[-] CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Because she will expierence sexual abuse there.

[-] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

What do you mean by sexual abuse?

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They probably meant "sexual harassment". Legally speaking, "sexual abuse" typically refers to sexual assault against a child. Verbal/online interactions would generally fall under "harassment".

[-] src@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Anyone can be sexually abused, not just underage people.

[-] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yes that's true.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
230 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37728 readers
623 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS