52
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Several U.S. states have enacted laws requiring pornography sites, such as PornHub, to implement age verification to prevent minors' access, prompting the site’s parent company, Aylo, to block access in affected states.

Proponents argue these laws protect children, while critics highlight privacy risks, inefficiencies, and potential censorship.

These measures reflect growing social conservatism, with some advocates aiming to restrict adult content broadly.

While privacy-focused age verification methods exist, regulatory clarity is lacking.

Critics warn these laws may suppress responsible platforms, favoring unregulated alternatives, and escalate broader culture wars around sexuality and LGBTQ+ rights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Several U.S. states have enacted laws requiring pornography sites, such as PornHub, to implement age verification to prevent minors' access

Doesn't seem too unreasonable. When I buy alcohol I have to provide verification that I'm over 21.

The thing is, how do they enforce it? People in those states can still access pornhub through a VPN. Plus, what about all the other many, many porn sites?

I get what they're trying to do, but I think there are some logistics that haven't really been thought out.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But that's just it, they have thought about the logistics. We already have Meta changing their rules to allow LGBTQ + people to be called "mentally ill" with no repercussions.

The Great Firewall of China isn't an accident, it's actually how internet hardware like routers and switches are built to work from the ground up, with security like access control lists, as well as logging connections and seeing what data goes where and so on. That's the scary thing about the internet, it just takes people wanting to turn it into a draconian nightmare to flip a few switches. I mean, really, the US already has but it just feels like it less because of the release valve of "free speech." The NSA Utah datacenter has been around for a while now.

They have thought about the logistics, and they want to bring those kind of controls here. As always the plan is to control what happens online. Musk has definitely made some weird and creepy comments about "making lists" and while he's an idiot, he's got the tools and people to make it happen.

They couch it in a reasonable position to start the path to blocking access to content about sexuality for anyone. When youre a queer kid growing up and being told that it's just the devil's work and other bullshit the internet and being able to talk about your experience was the first freeing thing you could do in your life. It also lead to women having higher standards because women could communicate more and not be isolated by their male partners controlling behavior. Conservatives fucking hate that. This kind of ban could ban that kind of speech online, and I firmly believe it's intended to.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

They expect the porn provider to verify age/id through very invasive and onerous means. It is in no way reasonable or secure to give some random porn site a copy of your government ID. They will get hacked; not if, when.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

They will get hacked; not if, when.

Not only that, it turns any site that doesn't just outright block the age verification states into a massive target.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io -1 points 1 year ago

When I buy alcohol I have to provide verification that I'm over 21

I was unaware that porn could kill you.

[-] lath@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Not your fault. Nobody can be aware of everything.

And yes, people have fapped to porn until they had a heart attack and died due to it.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago
[-] lath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

In other words, could have happened whether he was masturbating or having sex. Wasn't the masturbation that caused it, was the orgasm. I guess we're just not supposed to orgasm now?

Regardless, porn wasn't mentioned anywhere in that article.

Also...

The study authors say that they found just two other cases of masturbation-linked strokes in other scientific literature.

A whole two cases (three counting the linked one). Doesn't really seem like an epidemic now, does it? Considering legit every boy does it, and the ones that deny it are likely lying.

[-] lath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

However unlikely, it can nonetheless happen.

Regardless, porn wasn’t mentioned anywhere in that article.

Now that's just quibbling. Porn is generally used for the purpose of masturbation.

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
52 points (96.4% liked)

News

37764 readers
512 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS