127
Not so open, huh, sammy boy
(hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
127 points (97.7% liked)
technology
23495 readers
289 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
You can distill your own models based on your own models, the fact that OpenAI isn't doing this is more evidence that they are "competing" via investment capital and not tech.
OpenAI does this all the time. For example, all the models they offer for free users (like o1-mini or 3.5-turbo) are distilled models. The DeepSeek R1 is impressive because it's not a distilled model in the technical sense, but still has the cost benefits of distillation.
right if it was so easy to "distill" and "copy" then why haven't they done this to themselves for a more efficient model?