592
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

Unless there is a God and the person performing them just so happens to be God

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a bit silly to claim miracles don't happen because they aren't physically possible.

Unless there is a God

I think you're conflating physically possible and scientifically explainable.

My first comment though, I find it shocking you wouldn't understand that someone finds resurrection implausible.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is implausible, that's why it's so important that Jesus did it

Without miracles, Jesus would just be some madman walking about claiming to be God yet not being able to prove it.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Why isn't it plausible

It is implausible

I'm so confused by you right now.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

You said the story or Jesus was implausible, then elaborated on the miracles. The miracles are implausible. But if Jesus truly is God, then He could do the implausible. So the miracles don't render the story as a whole implausible, because the story is claiming that it was God Himself performing said miracles, which would make sense.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

It seems pretty clear that someone saying they find the story of Jesus implausible is by extension saying they find the existence of God implausible. Which would make sense.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
592 points (97.4% liked)

Greentext

8303 readers
1393 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS