648
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI) announced he will block all of Trump’s State Department nominees until USAID is reinstated.

His move comes after Elon Musk took control of USAID, placed senior staff on leave, and seized classified information.

Schatz condemned the administration’s “authoritarian behavior” and vowed to delay confirmations until USAID operates normally.

His blockade could significantly slow Trump’s ability to fill key diplomatic positions, forcing Senate Republicans to spend more time pushing nominations through.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesnt change the fact that apparently USAID is the red line for this guy.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not necessarily true. Often in situations like this you'll start with one simple demand and then if they cave, move on to the next

Think it's more so a matter of finally realizing the threat of the moment here

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

This has to do with the committee he is on.

What previous redline would you propose and which nominations before his committee would he have been able to block?

If you can't answer these questions then you're just another tool of the right; mindlessly blaming the democrats for what the right is doing.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lmao. The Democrats are actively enabeling Trumps bs. They will never learn.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

Shush, the adults are talking amongst themselves.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

USAID is probably a trial run for the monsters trying to tear our government apart to do Putin's bidding.

[-] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Components of the delusion in this worldview:

  1. That it's "our" government, not "their" government. This has been at best an aristocratic and at worst a totalitarian government for the entirety of U.S. history. Where was this democratic control during the Biden administration, when overwhelming resistance couldn't influence them to stop a genocide? Where was the democratic control during the Obama administration, when we couldn't stop unconstitutional PATRIOT Act enforcement, or end the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, but rather, witnessed a continual expansion of the Middle Eastern invasions/military theater into other countries like Libya and Somalia?

  2. Putin is behind the Trump presidency, not the same American oligarchy behind every single presidency. Please provide real proof of this. I have yet to see any. Something a hell of a lot more concrete than a "he said she said" or "funding for ads or bots came from Russia." It's my working theory that the "blame everything on Russia" is a propaganda line used to insulate Democrats from ideas that contradict their worldview.

  3. Assumption of a nefarious scheme to change the nature of the federal government, or institute a "takeover", versus the facade of one in a situation where it's already been taken over. Again, I think I phrased this same question to you yesterday - explain the consensus in SUPPORT of the Palestinian genocide. How does both the openly fascist party, and the so-called "opposition", SUPPORT that? Not asking you to justify it, or defend it, or say "tough shit those are our choices" - I want an explanation. How does something so insanely evil become a bipartisan political consensus, in the absence of central management? See point 1. My working theory is that this pretense is simply being used to expand control of the state over the individual while promoting the partisan D vs. R narrative.

  4. That USAID is some kind of net positive instead of a tool of U.S. imperialism. Read something like this - https://www.blackagendareport.com/weaponizing-aid-how-usaid-and-global-fragility-act-sustain-us-imperialism-libya or some of the Wikipedia overview of its weird history of association with espionage and U.S. empire building - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_International_Development#Controversies_and_criticism

As usual your takes seem to be rooted in the Dem party line as opposed to a solid, objective, anti-imperialist viewpoint.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
648 points (99.2% liked)

News

36384 readers
814 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS