this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
508 points (97.4% liked)
FediLore + Fedidrama
2159 readers
212 users here now
Rules
- Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
- When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
- The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.
The usual instance-wide rules also apply.
Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)
Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.
Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc
(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama
Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse
Partners:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
How about instead of puffing your chest out like an online incel douchebag asking me to cross a brand new line in the sand, you respond to what was already pointed out.
Almost nothing has been pointed out. You said my comment resembles those of "incel nazis". No actual explanation or concrete criticism, just aggressive vocabulary and vague accusations. Of course, you can't provide anything more than that - had i actually given even a hint of support for nazi ideology, you'd easily point it out, rather than just calling out... my wording?
What is this "my/our behaviour" that you're talking about exactly?
I didn't explicitly give verbal support to specific nazi parties (motte) I just said these snowflakes go running whenever some vague and nonspecific disagreement happens! (bailey)
You can't criticize me for using the exact same rhetorical tools literal nazis use and in the exact same context! It's just a coincidence! You have to follow my rules and satisfy my framing!
It's not like you offered any other framing, though, except through negation of mine. You are trying to say that the "disagreements" weren't just "disagreements", but you're insistent on not actually describing what they were, what actually happened, what was "my/our behaviour", etc. Just repeated attacks on my description of the situation (mainly based on my disagreement with the claim that Hexbear users were "traumatised" by the federation) and not providing your own.
It's funny how the guy that I initially replied to could clarify his view in a meaningful and hopefully informative way, while you've gone all out with semi-random insults.
Pompous, aggressive and entitled