564
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Summary

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo revealed that the U.S. agreed to curb gun smuggling into Mexico—something omitted from Trump’s statement about their call.

While Trump announced that Mexico would send 10,000 troops to the U.S. border, he did not mention this key concession.

Studies show 68–90% of traced firearms in Mexico originate from or pass through the U.S.

The tariff pause follows Mexico's commitment to increased border security, but Sheinbaum’s disclosure highlights a significant aspect Trump did not publicly acknowledge.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 3 months ago

Honestly, that’s not a bad deal. The US gets fentanyl enforcement. Mexico gets the flow of guns slowed, which weakens the cartels.

The tariff thing was a silly dance to get there, though. Makes me wonder if that wasn’t market manipulation. Knowing the tariffs would hit in the morning, then get lifted before enforcement would have made it very easy to play the market for a ton of money.

[-] badhops@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 months ago

but... the Mexican government already had the troops on the border. Biden did that in 2021.. so nothing new there. Most Fentanyl is smuggled in my US citizens as they are not scrutinized as much as a Mexican citizen coming in legally or illegally. So again not much of a win.. seems like a tantrum that is planned to set him and his wealthy friends to swoop in

[-] jdnewmil@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago

So optimistically assuming that Trump will follow through.

[-] takeda@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

Regarding fentanyl, trump did everything except actually address it. Why not impose sanctions on Chinese pharmaceutical companies? Improve regulations to allow tracking of fentanyl ingredients (which are legal), create a task force that would trace suppliers and help impose more sanctions.

[-] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

As is tradition, your mistake is in assuming he actually wants to help anyone

[-] miak@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Or they could have addressed both fentanyl in the US and the cartels in Mexico by just agreeing to end the war on drugs...

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 3 months ago

Except the US would giving up the current source of slave labor by stopping the war on drugs.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Almost nothing of the US fentanyl gets in through Mexico...

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Where do you get yours from.

[-] swampdownloader@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

How do you figure? From my understanding China and other places make precursor ingredients which are then manufactured in the field in Latin America. Are you saying the vast majority is fentanyl manufactured in China and shipped directly to the US?

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There has been lots of well published studies in the US last year. Well published enough to catch on the international press.

Most of their fentanyl seems to be smuggled out of their chemical and drug industries.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

The US gets fentanyl enforcement

Nothing was stopping the US from producing fentanyl.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
564 points (99.8% liked)

World News

46621 readers
2739 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS