submitted 4 days ago by Toes@ani.social to c/foss@beehaw.org

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

I take that there isn’t much motivation in moving to 128 because it’s big enough; it’s only 8 cycles (?) to fill a 512 (that can’t be right?).

8 cycles would be an eternity on a modern CPU, they can achieve multiple register sized loads per cycle.

If we do see a CPU with 128 bit addresses anytime soon, it'll be something like CHERI, where the extra bits are used for flags.

this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025

39 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

18085 readers

129 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS