4
Ransomware: To Pay or Not to Pay
(www.helpnetsecurity.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
4 points (83.3% liked)
Cybersecurity News
1326 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to Cybersecurity News!
A community that collect news and other tidbits related to cybersecurity in all its domains.
There are no hard and fast rules regarding what to post here-- we are fine with both pop news articles and more technical pieces regarding cybersecurity.
We use a bot called flynnbot to repost some rss feed content but the majority of posts are human-curated.
New to Cybersecurity?
Here are some resources to get you started:
Related Communities
!security_cpe@infosec.pub
!cybersecurity@zerobytes.monster
!packetstorm@zerobytes.monster
!security@programming.dev
!secops@lemmy.world
!cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works
!netsec@zerobytes.monster
!securitynews@infosec.pub
!cloudsecurity@infosec.pub
!netsec@links.hackliberty.org
!cybersecurity@infosec.pub
!cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Good point about the cyber-insurance aspect of things perpetuating the problem.
I don't have hard data but I believe this will be a thing of the past soon enough. With ransomware being so common an issue now & the requirements to obtain said insurance getting harder to meet, I could see that not being a viable or cost-effective solution to restoring service.
I hope you're right that it does phase out. Here is evidence that having cyber insurance makes you more of a target.
DS: Do your operators target organizations that have cyber insurance?
UNK: Yes, this is one of the tastiest morsels. Especially to hack the insurers first—to get their customer base and work in a targeted way from there. And after you go through the list, then hit the insurer themselves.
Interview
That is an excellent interview ... Thanks for sharing.
That certainly adds to the whole problem with payouts.