716
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Sen. Bernie Sanders is touring Iowa and Nebraska to rally against “the oligarchy,” aiming to energize progressives rather than launch a 2028 presidential bid.

At 83, he seeks to shape the Democratic Party’s future, arguing it lost in 2024 by neglecting working-class voters.

He hopes to influence budget battles and the 2026 midterms, targeting GOP lawmakers in battleground districts.

With Democrats lacking clear leadership, Sanders’ prominence and focus on economic inequality could define the party’s direction in the Trump-Musk era.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Whateley@lemm.ee 83 points 2 months ago

83 and he's still got that dog in him.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 39 points 2 months ago

While I feel bernie wants to save capitalism from itself rather then replace it, I have to admire the persistence. I would have died 3 deaths of despair if I would have gone through what he has. And to just watch the nation melt around you no matter what you do or say.

Bernie Sanders is a stronger man then me

[-] Bloomcole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

Yep, he won't bite the hand that feeds him. He's a good doggy. Barks loud but when it matters he does exactly what master says.

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

If you look at his vote record he hasn’t bowed to anyone, even when he’s been the only senator voting against something

[-] Bloomcole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

he’s been the only senator voting against something>

I have literally said this in another comment. He and other fake progressives do this when they are absolutely sure it will have no consequences. Not when it's possibly a close call. Pure empty virtue signaling.

I'll copy another comment on his voting habbits tho :

VOTED in favor of almost every US invasion in the following nations: Afghanistan, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Yugoslavia,2, Bosnia, Haiti, Congo, Liberia, Sudan, and Ukraine. Even parroting the regime narrative that drones ‘are sellective’ and ‘take out the people they should’ while 90% they killed are innocent people. Be a “I am 100% pro-Israel” genocide supporter. VOTES in favour of the US aid to the Zionist settler-colony every time. VOTED in favor of a resolution that “reaffirms the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 . During the 2014 assault on Gaza, blatantly biased Senate resolutions S. Res 498 and S. Res 526 that fully condoned the Israeli assault and characterized it as “self-defense” were passed by unanimous consent. Although Sanders did not co-sponsor either resolution, he failed to register any formal objection (a resolution passes by unanimous consent if no objection is raised; as such, no vote is taken). To be clear, this is not the first time Sanders failed to speak up in Congress against Israel’s brutal assault of Gaza. In 2012, Sanders failed to register any objection against biased Senate resolution S. Res 599 that couched Israel’s bombing of Gaza as “self-defense” and that passed by unanimous consent; according to Human Rights organization B’Tselem, 167 Palestinians were killed, including at least 87 civilians (vs. 4 Israeli civilians). In 2009, biased Senate resolution S. Res 10 backed Israel’s assault on Gaza and yet again justified it as Israel’s “right to defend itself” without garnering any objection from Sanders (it passed by unanimous consent); according to B’Tselem, 1387 Palestinians were killed, including at least 773 civilians (vs. 3 Israeli civilians). In 2006, Sanders actually supported the brutal Israeli assault on Gaza and Lebanon during the war that killed 1191 Lebanese civilians per Amnesty International (vs. 43 Israeli civilians killed) when he VOTED Yea to House resolution H. Res 921.

He can speech, object, condemn or whatever he does. It’s empty words.

[-] ProtecyaTec@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He and other fake progressives do this when they are absolutely sure it will have no consequences.

Not when it’s possibly a close call. Pure empty virtue signaling.

First off, based on everything else he does - who fucking cares fr What a great way to both share your stance on an issue and garner attention for your causes - stand out. It's both harmless and clever - in American Politics even.

[-] Bloomcole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

TF is this opinion?

Who cares about his VOTING? The only thing that actually has effect. Right, "but he SAYS what we think so well" that's what important to you? Great take.

[-] ProtecyaTec@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Your claim is that "Bernie being the only one voting 'no' is virtue signaling." where my point is that if you know a vote is going to pass or fail, you might as well either stand out of use that opportunity to voice your opinion. If a vote is going to pass regardless of Bernies vote, who care if he wants to use that as a catalyst to spread his message, ideas, and opinions.

[-] Bloomcole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

I have posted an extensive list of his horrible pro-war empire and zionist voting. Leave the " to voice your opinion....a catalyst to spread his message, ideas, and opinions." for the brochure. The only thing he's spreading is the illusion there is place for progressives in that horrible party and to keep gullible people away from 3rd parties that actually want change. End of convo

[-] ProtecyaTec@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I saw that, I wasn't commenting to your entire opinion which is why I quoted the specific parts I was referring to.

The only thing he’s spreading is the illusion there is place for progressives in that horrible party

That's not the message I'm getting from his talks and video blog updates. Maybe stop reading article headlines and head to the source directly to reinforce your opinion on the message he's spreading. I don't think you're here to convince people of some kind of solution or better future though. All you've done is doomsay and complain. None of your opinions address the current message he's trying to get to the people, which is that Billionaires are buying Politicians and money in Politics is a huge problem right now, and We, The People, need to voice our opinions on it or do something about it before it gets too bad.

Your Doomsaying only distracts from the current problems at hand, which I'm willing to bet you understand.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago
[-] Bloomcole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago
[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago
[-] Whateley@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

You certainly are.

[-] gimmelemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You mean THIS house resolution 921?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/921

H.Res.921 - Honoring the 30th anniversary of the National Guard Youth Challenge Program. 118th Congress (2023-2024)

I think I smell bullshit

[-] Bloomcole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago
[-] WordBox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You've got a shit attitude and folks won't listen until you fix yourself.

[-] Bloomcole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

If they can't take the truth it's their problem. They have been screwing themselves for centuries continuing this uniparty BS and their token progressives. AOC can take over from him and they can continue for centuries more. Me personally am doing great and none of this, whoever wins anything affects me in the least. I just don't get how people can vote against their own interests. Then again there's black and latinos for Trump so there doesn't seem to be much logic in people's reasoning.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

here's the truth you can't take, you're an asshole and a moron.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Fucking dumb troll

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

He's never been anything other than a sheepdog for the DNC.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
716 points (99.2% liked)

politics

23262 readers
2283 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS