775
No Way (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes.

Yes, I do.

So do a lot of people a lot smarter than myself.

And that's on top of the very real, very well documented voter roll purging that affected mostly minority voters.

It's not even like this is the first time. Everyone who's able and interested should check out the HBO documentary Hacking Democracy about the 2004 election.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It was fascinating in 2008 watching a FOX anchor arguing with their in-house analysts when they called Ohio for Obama. He was arguing that the votes would start shifting to McCain just like they did for Bush in 2004. Sure enough, the same glitch happened, but the vote ratio didn't change.

He started getting frantic after that, sure that the votes would start going for McCain any minute. It was super obvious he knew about what actually happened in 2004.

Interestingly, "Anonymous" claimed to have blocked the hack saving the election; which is both nonsense and probably technically true at the same time.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 11 months ago

Drag googled "Anonymous Obama election" and couldn't find anything

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Interesting times ahead for the US when both of their major sided are losing (or lost) faith in elections.

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

The right got dozens of days in court to share whatever evidence they claimed to have that 2020 was stolen. They couldn't provide a single shred of evidence for voter fraud that wasn't in their favor. Now, with plenty of evidence, if the other side requests their day in court they are called crazy and conspiracy theorists and blue maga and blue anon and any other number of ad hominem attacks. What are they afraid of, if there was no hack let them prove it in court. But republicans don't play fair and they never have, so why are Dems playing so easily into their hands? Are they that desperate to distance themselves from what they've seen as crazy election deniers? That means all the ad hominem worked.

[-] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

💯

Verifying the vote isn’t denialism. The evidence is compelling and coherent. Too many whiners not enough debunkers!

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Like said, interesting times coming up.

this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
775 points (92.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

10342 readers
409 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If a post is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Be nice. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements to private messages.
  7. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS