47

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25963666

Osgood Perkins' "The Monkey" opens to $14.2 million, second best ever for Neon

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Could it be that after milking that sorry Marvel franchise for all it was worth for years, Disney fails to excite people with their nth ultra-samey, ultra-low-originality rehash?

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

They're just not willing to take the risks they were talking when marvel was still going solo before it's Disney acquisition. Disney isn't big on risks.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Some of the TV shows have been more creative. The current movies are just rehashes though.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

What risks did they use to take? As long as I remember the Marvel movies have been formulaic copies

[-] keyez@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Giving creative control to specific directors to let their vision shine through the project: Iron Man, Guardians of the Galaxy, Thor Love and Thunder, etc.

Edit meant Thor Ragnarok the Taika Waititi directed movie.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, Iron man was like literally the first movie in the MCU (discounting that Hulk movie), it also literally started the trope of Bad Guy has literally the same skillset/power as the good guy that was replicated a bunch of times.

GotG, and Thor: Ragnarok are the only movies that are unique and carried by their directors.

Love and thunder is a dumpster fire.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think bad guy having the same skillset is really just a superhero trope.

  • Flash vs Zoom
  • Green vs Yellow Lantern
  • Spidey vs Venom
  • Aquaman vs Black Manta
  • Wonder woman vs Ares
  • Green Arrow vs Dark Archer

I listed DC heroes primarily to show it isn't just a Marvel thing. But all of these arch enemies are basically evil duplicates of the hero.

I think the trope largely stems from a "How do you defeat someone who is as powerful/strong as you" kinda thing.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

But count how many DC films have it vs how many MCU films

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well it'd be the ratio we care about, but let's see (should only count first movie to simplify) and just saying yes if villian has same powers.

Marvel:

  • Ironman - yes
  • Cap - yes
  • Thor - no
  • Hulk (if you count 2008 film) - yes
  • Guardians - pass (ensemble so kinda hard to say)
  • Antman - yes
  • Doctor Strange - yes
  • Spiderman - no
  • Black Panther - yes
  • Cpt Marvel - No/maybe

DC:

  • Superman - yes (cause this iteration started with Zod, even if lex Luther is real arch enemy)
  • Batman - pass (too many reboots and maybe we count anyone cause he has no powers)
  • Wonder woman - yes
  • Flash - yes
  • Aquaman - yes (maybe BlackManta is different enough, but I'm counting it)
  • Bluebeetle - yes
  • Shazam - no

So 6/10 vs 4/7 or 60% for marvel vs 57% for DC. So surprisingly around the same.

Edited to fix formatting

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You can't not count batman, it's a no.

So is Aquaman.

And so is Wonder Woman, not sure how you can say Ares has the same skillset as WW.

[-] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ah I think Thor Ragnarok was what I meant, the Taika Waititi directed movie

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Both are directed by Watiti. However, he got high on his own supply after Ragnarok, which how he made Love and Thunder.

In my opinion, Ragnarok itself was mid af movie with too many quips. And I absolutely hated Korg which was just a Watiti self-insert.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

I mean making a movie about Iron Man, not the most popular character they had, starring Robert Downey Jr, who was recovering from all sorts of issues.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Disney bought them out after like the third or fourth movie, MCU is pretty much just Disney.

[-] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Those films were already scripted, cast, and costed out at acquisition, part of the Russo Roadmap. That all finished with endgame and handed the reins over to the corporate writer-room slop ever since.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Disney bought Marvel before the second MCU film even came out (unless you count the Hulk movie) in 2009. End game wouldnt happen for another 10 years.

Also I think it's Kevin Feige who's given the most credit for the planning around the MCU.

Regardless having a general plan for 10 years of movies does not mean you have a finalized script, cast, and directors locked down. I mean even just having Chadwick Boseman pass would have significant impacts.

[-] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Fair enough, I take back their lack of involvement. Maybe Feige cared more about getting it right, then hasn't cared since? We can agree that the initial burst up to Civil War was far different from post-endgame disordered half-baked arcs. What even is the arc now? Celestials into XMen?

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, honestly I think they just wrote themselves into a corner with end game. The five year time jump is sooo messy, not to mention they just didn't use any of the first three phases to setup the next set of heroes.

I always thought we should've finally gotten an older Spiderman as it would have been great to see a Spiderman have to take up the mantle of leadership and take the movies in a slightly different direction than the comics.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
47 points (91.2% liked)

Movies

8453 readers
20 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS