378
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 77 points 10 months ago

That doesn't sound like a tough choice at all...

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 10 months ago

seriously i just deleted windows and put mint on my laptop (which is only like from 2020ish) and it runs better than it ever did on windows

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 10 months ago

Yeah, both my Linux PC's probably wouldn't even run Win 10, let alone Win 11. As long as they work, pretty much any PC from the last decade can still run any distro and be sufficient to do any kind of productivity workload.

[-] Lawdoggo@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Can confirm with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS vs my previous W11 install, it’s astonishing that a company with Microsoft’s resources can’t make an OS that runs as smoothly and efficiently as the open-source alternatives. Is it all just because of telemetry and whatever else Windows is phoning home with?

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 10 months ago

I think it's just that they don't care about performance. It's been the case for a while that typically games run faster on Linux through WINE/Proton despite using a translation layer.

And there's a bunch of background services taking up memory and CPU on Windows that are hard to turn off.

[-] balder1993@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

As a company, Microsoft doesn’t reward anyone for improving the performance of the OS. That should be enough of an explanation 😆.

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
378 points (99.0% liked)

Linux

11522 readers
602 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS