834
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

I want to get rid of it because I want a non sugar coke that doesn't taste like burned tar soaked in urine

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Then drink the Diet Coke with Splenda one? There's also Coke Life that has stevia instead. They basically made sure they have a version with each type of sweetener.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Splenda is worse... Stevia is fine

[-] BlueDwaggin@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago

I find that Stevia has a vaguely creamy flavour to it. Which works well in some instances, and not in others.

Aspartame just tastes awful, for me I get this weird sticky/bitter sensation over the roof of my mouth and turn my throat.

Splenda/Sucralose tastes fine, but has noticeable effects elsewhere, which are a bit TMI.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32289 readers
710 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS