[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yes, it is their fault the nazis viewed them as subhuman and exterminated them in a way they didn't do with the conquered French. /s

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

Have you actually studied ww2? France fell in weeks. So yeah the Soviets did better.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

Yes, I think our democratic processes could be better in many countries.

No, we do not have democracy. We have bourgeois democracy that cannot be reformed into democracy.

What is bourgeois democracy?: https://www.leftvoice.org/bourgeois-democracy-what-do-marxists-mean-by-that-term/

If you are skeptical of the inability to reform bourgeois democracy I would do some reading on Allende and Chile.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

And you think the numerically inferior soviet troops -who did better than the larger more mechanized and better equipped French and British troops- while also fighting a larger better equipped force demonstrates....

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The point of this exercise is for you to find the numbers and experience a moment of self reflection. What I think of the credibility of the numbers doesn't matter.

You won't though. One has to wonder why?

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, capitalism vs socialism is; who owns the means of production, the capitalist class or the working class?

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Okay, then go find other sources for these numbers:

  • Number of axis troops invading France

  • Number of French and British commonwealth troops during the initial defense of France

  • Number of axis troops invading the Soviet Union

  • Number of Soviet troops during the initial defense of the Soviet Union

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Do you think your bourgeois democracy is actually democratic? If you are for democracy you'd be a socialist.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Literally just look up the numbers on Wikipedia(or whatever other center-right source you consider credible) and stop embarrassing yourself.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Remind me how many French and British troops were bypassed and encircled during the invasion of France?

Remember that the combined forces in France were much larger and more mechanized than the soviet army during barbarossa, and were invaded by less troops

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah countries which the US has couped in my parent's lifetimes are more democratic than Cuba, where residents sometimes complain that the government consults them too much and which regularly has referendums over measures refined up from local committees everywhere until they have a measure to vote on. (See: family code)

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

They defeated the Nazis by throwing conscripts into a meat grinder regardless of whether they even had a weapon, and by threatening to shoot them if they tried to retreat.

You are mistaking the movie enemy at the gates for a history lesson, or are absorbing myths that ultimately originate with that movie.. During particularly desperate times troops would have to split rifles during training. General order 227 created penal detachments for officers who kept ordering retreats without cause, and created blocking units to turn back retreating units. They weren't machine gunning conscripts in the back.

Also even if not one step back was as US propaganda claims, every step back allowed the nazis more population to exterminate or enslave. The Soviets lost 19 million civilians, exterminated by the nazis.

22
submitted 6 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
26
submitted 7 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
1
"Tankies" (youtu.be)
submitted 7 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.ml
22
submitted 8 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
25
submitted 9 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Press Statement by Spokesman for DPRK Ministry of National Defence Pyongyang, December 2 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Ministry of National Defence of the DPRK released the following press statement "Any attack on space asset of the DPRK will be deemed declaration of war against it" on Saturday:

The brigandish nature of the U.S., which regards it as its main lever for realizing its hegemonic wild ambition to commit outrageous and unlawful military intervention against sovereign countries, has been brought to light more clearly, occasioned by the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite launch.

An official concerned of the U.S. Space Command recently spouted rubbish hinting at a military attack on the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite, saying that the U.S. can decrease the enemy country's outer space operation capabilities by employing diverse "reversible and irreversible methods".

American military affairs experts comment that the U.S. Space Force can physically destroy not only opponent's satellite and satellite earth station but also get rid of enemy state's space force through jamming and virus-using cyber attack.

The U.S. Space Force's deplorable hostility toward the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite can never be overlooked as it is just a challenge to the sovereignty of the DPRK, and more exactly, a declaration war against it.

Article 8 of the "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies", the main international outer space treaty, stipulates that any object launched into outer space definitely falls under the jurisdiction of the launcher state and the ownership of it never changes no matter it remains in outer space or returned to the earth.

This means that the reconnaissance satellite "Malligyong-1" is a part of the territory of the DPRK where its sovereignty is exercised.

Furthermore, reconnaissance satellite is not regarded as a space weapon by international law for its technical features aimed at observation.

If the reconnaissance satellite of the DPRK is regarded by the U.S. as a "military threat" that must be gotten rid of, countless spy satellites of the U.S. flying above the Korean peninsula region every day, exclusively tasked with monitoring the major strategic spots of the DPRK, should be deemed the primary targets to be destroyed by the armed forces of the DPRK.

By openly unveiling its aggression scheme to mount a military attack on a space asset of other sovereign country, a part of its properties and territory, the U.S. has proved itself its true colors as the chief culprit of evils seeking to realize its wild ambition for dominating the world by turning outer space, common wealth of humankind, into a theater of war.

It is the mission of the armed forces of the DPRK, specified by its constitution and other laws, to exercise their war deterrent to protect the state sovereignty and territorial integrity in case a lethal military attack is carried out against the country's strategic assets or it is judged that such attack is imminent.

In case the U.S. tries to violate the legitimate territory of a sovereign state by weaponizing the latest technologies illegally and unjustly, the DPRK will consider taking responsive action measures for self-defence to undermine or destroy the viability of the U.S. spy satellites by exercising its legitimate rights vested by international and domestic laws. -0- www.kcna.kp (Juche112.12.2.)

56
submitted 9 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
45
submitted 10 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
-4
submitted 10 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world
142
submitted 10 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
75

Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.

9

Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.

365
No comment (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

OurToothbrush

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF