2542
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ComfyMuffin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

We did a case study on this in college. The bakery didn't refuse service to them, they told the couple that they were more than welcome to pick any of the predesigned cakes they had, but the bakery wouldn't make a pride specific cake.

the bakery wouldn't make a pride specific cake

LOL in other words they would not serve them.

[-] Imotali@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

So discrimination specifically based on a protected class.

Right I was pointing out the laughable explanation that amounts to an admission to the discrimination.

[-] Batpool23@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Ok fair enough, thank you. That is not much better in regards to the bakery. It also makes this store all the worse though. Discrimination is never the answer, although many here seem to think it is. Faith in humanity is certainly not restored. Let go of the anger Padawans.

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
2542 points (94.0% liked)

Malicious Compliance

20 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS