Lol. The Paradox of Tolerance is on par with the Libertarian Non-aggression Principle. Purely academic, purely subjective and, ironically, a moral imposition.
Yes? That's kinda the point of a thought experiment ? Do you think the trolley problem is less than "purely academic"? Or that Schrodinger actually put a cat in a box?
There are many people, like OP, that see things like the paradox of tolerance as some nouveau morality. It presents itself under the guise of being peaceful and tolerant when it is really a moral subjectivists justification for violence. It is dishonest and so are it's proponents.
Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
Lol. The Paradox of Tolerance is on par with the Libertarian Non-aggression Principle. Purely academic, purely subjective and, ironically, a moral imposition.
Yes? That's kinda the point of a thought experiment ? Do you think the trolley problem is less than "purely academic"? Or that Schrodinger actually put a cat in a box?
There are many people, like OP, that see things like the paradox of tolerance as some nouveau morality. It presents itself under the guise of being peaceful and tolerant when it is really a moral subjectivists justification for violence. It is dishonest and so are it's proponents.