181
submitted 2 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 17 points 2 months ago

Almost like an idiot made the decision to make arbitrary cuts to vital services.

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Not arbitrary at all. Focused, targeted, lobbied and paid for by an industry that massively benefits from shaping the body of knowledge and discussion around the topic.

Arbitrary implies indifference or accidental; this is strategic, premeditated and predatory.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If it was focused they'd leave the weather forecast alone and only targeted climate change. Instead they cut everything.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 months ago

They have two things going on:

  • the historical weather data is what gets used to show past climate and the change we are seeing
  • the founder of AccuWeather thinks he can make more money if government forecasts are less accurate and paid his way into the upper echelon of the Republican Party.
[-] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I'm sure there's a privatisation play going on, but there's no way you can actually make money on providing weather forecasts if you're suddenly going to be needing to put weather stations everywhere. I guess they'll just force the government to keep paying for those and just do the forecasting based on the raw data.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
181 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6709 readers
156 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS