153
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 59 points 2 weeks ago

After construction of the experimental reactor started in 2018, most of the scientists involved in the project abandoned their holidays – they worked day and night, and some stayed on site for more than 300 days in a year.

That's not ideal

[-] SamotsvetyVIA@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

It's stupid but this is the norm around the world. At my plant, which is not a nuclear plant, most of the engineers and workers can't take a leave and are always "on call" (even though their contract is not an on call contract) until they can get a break once in around 1.5 years because we are technically understaffed. And this isn't even a meaningful plant, if it goes down nothing really happens.

[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

I did see something about how a lot of the hydro plants in the US are becoming woeful understaffed because there is no appetite to hire staff and very few people have the appropriate training anyway

[-] SamotsvetyVIA@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They can definitely hire staff, especially in the US of all places there is no shortage of promising engineers. Very few people get hired to these kinds of plants fully trained, most pick up 90% of their skills on the job. It's just a long process. The real reason, at least for our plant (a plant that has already returned all its investment dividends tenfold, passed its calculated lifespan, and is now just a money printing machine), is that there are chiefly 2 ways (3 in our country, but this isn't about that) that the plant becomes more economical to keep running: process improvements or reduction of labour costs. The sacrifice first comes for maintenance staff, overworking them, then for all other disciplines depending on whats allowed to be gutted by law. Engineers are actually making out in a relatively "favourable" position, since they can directly contribute to process improvements - the company has fewer incentives to let them go. This situation ends in there being a settled number of so-and-so engineers, which is "understaffed" according to your and mine definitions, but is the perfect amount for the line-go-up number-crunchers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
153 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23721 readers
137 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS