1130
Notepad (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago
  1. Literally has meant figuratively since it first appeared as a word in the 1700s and this usage is listed in every major dictionary
  2. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/20/energy/three-mile-island-microsoft-ai/index.html
[-] tostiman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago
[-] mhague@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I wonder, why is 'literally' so special?

Someone steps out into unexpectedly cold weather and says, "It's freezing out here." But it's not below freezing.

Someone that hasn't eaten all day takes a bite and says, "I was starving, this is the best burger I've ever tasted!" They weren't really starving, and they probably didn't just rank every burger they've eaten.

We exaggerate and/or use words incorrectly for the effect so often, people are constantly using words "incorrectly" but then they say, "I'm literally dead right now." and dictionaries change their definitions and people point out semantics. It's like literally is figuratively magic.

[-] FrChazzz@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago

It’s almost like language is radically democratic and words only mean what we largely agree they mean, with fluctuating cases based on particular contexts.

[-] theblips@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah, somehow "literally" is the only word in a figure of speech that cannot be part of the figure at all! They are so smart for pointing that out

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 5 points 10 months ago

"Freezing" is an exaggeration of "cold", just like "starving" is an exaggeration of "hungry". It's "a lot of X".

"Literally" is not an exaggeration, it's the opposite of "figuratively". It's "-X".

Those are two entirely different things. But of course inflammable means flammable.

[-] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 6 points 10 months ago

“Literally” is not an exaggeration

Correct, it's an "intensifier"

[-] oo1@lemmings.world 4 points 10 months ago

And "terrific" and "awesome" are exaggerations of "scary".

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 10 months ago

Yes. Am I meant to add anything here?

[-] oo1@lemmings.world 5 points 10 months ago

No, it's just another example that words' usages and meanings can change a lot, even flip, over time. A new usage can literally spread like a ~~~~virus~~~~ meme and become the meaning - at least to all intensive porpoises.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 10 months ago

I know, it's completely normal. Doesn't mean I have to like a particular usage.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Words, usually.

[-] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 10 months ago

Incorrect.

Freezing
"Freezing is a phase transition in which a liquid turns into a solid when its temperature is lowered below its freezing point."

Starvation
"Starvation is a severe deficiency in caloric energy intake, below the level needed to maintain an organism's life."

You are literally wrong, and I will accept a 1-page apology written in MLA format before the end of this week.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 10 months ago

I honestly do not see the contradiction. "Very cold" -> liquid turns to solid. "Very hungry" -> severe deficiency.

[-] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Then how do you explain iron, which freezes below 2,800 Fahrenheit, hm? 2,800 Fahrenheit is hot.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 10 months ago

"Very" and "a lot" are subjective.

[-] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

You cannot be "freezing" unless you are a bloodsicle. This follows from the exact definition of the word. Words have meanings, you know. If people can just say whatever they want, then what is the point of communication?

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 months ago

Sanction is the exact opposite of sanction, but you never see people moan about that for some reason

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contronym

[-] oo1@lemmings.world 4 points 10 months ago

Table can mean "to discuss a topic at a meeting" (British English) or "to postpone discussion of a topic" (American English). Canadian English uses both meanings of the word

Canada . . . seriously? I can't sanction that type of behaviour.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

That's the problem with being influenced by both British and American English. We have both senses in New Zealand English too, although I think the US one is slowly winning out and the British one might one day fall out of use.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/literally

That's one of it's senses, yes, but how many of those definitions are the opposite of figurative?

[-] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 10 months ago

The correct definition is the opposite of figuratively. This has been an ongoing linguistic war for nearly a century, and your WRONG thoughts on how it should be used only serve to further the enemies cause.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

This has been an ongoing linguistic war for nearly a century

So after over a century of people using it that way some other people got a stick up their butt about it, cool. Doesn't make it wrong.

[-] oo1@lemmings.world 6 points 10 months ago

People who get het up about "literally" are fabulous.

If Dickens, Twain and Joyce can use it as an intensifier, then that's awesome enough for me.

Of course literally is often overused figuratively, flogged like a dead metaphorse; but used literally, literally is often literally redundant anyway.

I think it's got a third use now though, which is even more fun, using it to troll languague purists who think language drives communication rather than the other way round. That might well have motivated Mark Twain too.

[-] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

Napoleon! Enemy anti-literalists have infiltrated another thread—we need reinforcements now!

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1130 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11028 readers
306 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS