46
submitted 2 days ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

I'm not going to say the story backs the hed. Nonetheless, this isn't what you want to read happening. Selecting the correct excerpt is usually an easy task.

Here, it isn't.

The full story should be read, but the best I can do is this:

For the former US secretary of state Antony Blinken, Donald Trump’s indifference to alienating allies is an act of vandalism. He said diplomats around the world were asking: “What the fuck is going on?”

Blinken said America had spent 80 years building up trust, strong economic partnerships and military and political alliances, and if that was then taken down in a matter of 100 days it would be incredibly hard to rebuild.

“It means countries look for ways to work around us, to work together but without the US,” he said. “The possibility that what will be said today will be reversed tomorrow, and will be reversed again, means they simply cannot count on us. Joe Biden used to say it is never a good idea to bet against America. The problem we now have is people are no longer betting on America.”

I don't think anyone is arguing that there's any remaining U.S. hegemony, but this is stark. Get ready for everything you've known about the postwar era to go away. What comes next? Likely not anything good.

Seriously: Read the full piece. This is a five-alarm shitshow, and we're worrying about Barbie imports.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 8 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately can't read the article without accepting cookies, but the exerpt you shared is indeed poignant and mirrors my own thinking recently. Nothing about the current global climate is encouraging.

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago

I have rather strong online hygiene myself and several Firefox add-ons such as NoScript, already behind Mullvad. The Guardian works fine for me. If you're locked down even harder, that's of course your choice, but it seems odd that you'd block cookies from a nonprofit.

[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Its not the nonprofit whose cookies I am worried about, it is their ~~135~~ 133 partners. I'm also using no script and a hardened Firefox - perhaps you've just accepted the guardian's cookies?

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago

One of my add-ons is the one that bypasses cookie requests. Sets it strictly to first-party. NoScript handles the rest of my concerns.

[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago

Interesting, I wonder how thats working under the hood with the guardian since their subscription model determines which cookies you can decline

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22325 readers
56 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS