125
AI hallucinations are getting worse – and they're here to stay
(www.newscientist.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
125 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
38642 readers
407 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
In the case of reasoning models, definitely. Reasoning datasets weren't even a thing a year ago and from what we know about how the larger models are trained, most task-specific training data is artificial (oftentimes a small amount is human-generated and then synthetically augmented).
However, I think it's safe to assume that this has been the case for regular chat models as well - the self-instruct and ORCA papers are quite old already.