127
Supreme Court allows Trump to implement transgender military ban
(www.nbcnews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
127 points (98.5% liked)
News
37227 readers
700 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They are a transphobe. Even tagged then as such the previous time they tried to pass off their hate as "just stuff everyone knows is true".
I wouldn't bother.
Edited to add: Yeah, see reply, they just keep going. "If being transphobic makes me a transphobe then words have lost meaning" is... Well, something.
Tag accuracy confirmed!
Acknowledging that males and females are different makes someone transphobic in your mind, does it?
There could, in fact, not be the category of trans if there was no gender binary. Without the moon, no cis- and translunar orbits. A boundary has to exist before it is possible to cross it or, indeed, stay within it.
That boundary is a quite bit fuzzy because gender is a bimodal distribution: Two bell curves which meet in the middle. But it clearly is there, those two humps clearly exist, they may apply to no individual but they apply, statistically, to the population as a whole, and as we're individuals and not statistics where shit gets stupid is when people are saying "you're on that side of the graph in aspect X, therefore you must be on the same side in aspect Y": It's trying to enforce a strict boundary when things are, well, fuzzy. Multi-dimensional, at the very least. There's women with beards and men who can give birth. There always have been, and if that scares you then you should learn to live and let live.
"Trans" means people who are one sex who think they are the other, or think they are a "gender" different to what their sex determined gender is. That's fine, they can identify themselves however they want in terms of "gender identity".
Gender as it is now used is basically a "feeling". It's not scientific. It's not based on science or biology or anything tangible. It's literally just feelings. This is why there should not be any laws based on "gender", but instead all based on sex - when anyone can change their gender at any time, basing anything on gender is completely pointless.
Sex is not "fuzzy". There are 2 sexes, male and female. 2 gametes. 2 chromosomes. These "men" who can give birth are females/women who "identify" as the gender of "man".
For the bearded women, facial hair doesn't determine sex.
That's not even covering karyotypes, much less phenotypes. Read up on the actual biology before making BS claims like that.
Dunno if you deleted your comment or what but I have the notification for it so I’ll reply to this one:
XXY karotypes exist, sure - that would be a male with a DSD. All DSDs affect either a male or a female. They are disorders that affect one or both sexes, not different sexes.
Phenotypes are whole irrelevant. They’re just observable traits , like height or eye colour. There are no “female sex determining phenotypes”.
It all is very complex, but the number of sexes isn’t - male and female are all there is.
Also you used a fungus as an example of 20k sexes? This is incorrect. There are “20k” mating types, not sexes.
I didn't delete anything, your instance must be slow federating.
Having the one or other set of reproductive organs, or something in between, is a phenotype. Phenotypes are the result of genes interacting with the environment, and your genitals are, indeed, a result of that. All of you is a result of that (because you don't have any of your original cells any more).
In any case so you do seem to acknowledge complexity. Sexes, btw, as you describe them, are precisely "mating types", I mean you started out with gametes. As to the choice of organism: You baited me, you said "creature on earth". Fungi, last I checked, fit that category. Andorians have four sexes, btw.
Given that you accept all that complexity, why not the possibility of mind and body not matching up, making affected people have a rather intense desire to live their life as the gender opposite their overt phenotype?
What about the absolute deluge of studies that show that that, indeed, is a thing that happens? Why even argue this, when the science is settled? What's in it for you?
There are 2 sexes, factually. If you can show a third that has ever existed in any creature on earth you would win a Nobel prize.
Schizophyllum commune has over 20k sexes.
As to humans: You could have googled karyotype and understood that there's things like XXY, you could have googled phenotype and understood that you can have a XY karyotype and still a female phenotype.
This is all massively more complex and diverse than you think it is I've not even scratched the tip of the iceberg here.
Gender fraud, seriously? What’s wrong with these people?
Have they improved their electric and other utilities so that they don't collapse in the slightest breeze? Or are they still doing stuff like this as a distraction
Disgusting. I hate this timeline.
The only laws that matter are ones that are actually laws, not proposed laws. That proposal isn’t going anywhere
Even if it did, it’s still not saying trans people don’t exist.