573

Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was meeting last week with representatives from a teachers union in his home state when things quickly devolved.

Before long, Fetterman began repeating himself, shouting and questioning why “everybody is mad at me,” “why does everyone hate me, what did I ever do” and slamming his hands on a desk, according to one person who was briefed on what occurred.

As the meeting deteriorated, a staff member moved to end it and ushered the visitors into the hallway, where she broke down crying. The staffer was comforted by the teachers who were themselves rattled by Fetterman’s behavior, according to a second person who was briefed separately on the meeting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gregg@lemm.ee 208 points 1 month ago

It’s incredible how many passes he’s gotten since his stroke. He’s been spiraling hard. Megalomania, paranoia, and overall reckless behavior have become more common traits, but according to him he’s fine, he says while seething through clenched teeth.

[-] normanwall@lemmy.world 198 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Gets brain damage

Becomes conservative snowflake

I have had to watch this happen to a close friend.

Back in 2015, I had a buddy who got into a nasty bike accident, and suffered a TBI. He was always a bit of a snarky asshole, but we definitely did see eye to eye on political matters before that happened. But during his recovery, he became a lot more viciously vindictive and outright mean, and also ended up going full MAGA later on. It was weird and depressing to watch a close friend spiral out of control and lash out at people who were previously his very close friends, to the extent that he alienated basically all of them.

It sucks, and it’s very real.

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

I wonder how much high school athletics have contributed to conservatism via head injuries and groupthink?

Honestly, probably a lot

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

its either cte, strokes, or drugs turn into a nutty christian right winger. or if you have something like undiagnosed schizophrenia.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

drugs turn into a nutty christian right winger.

Uhhhhh yeah I don't think so. I think you're seeing former addicts that go hard for religion, and yeah that's real... But it's usually not the drugs that do it.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's been known for a long time: "I used to be all fucked on on drugs. Now I'm all fucked up on the Lord."

Already in the early 70s, there were rightwing fundie groups operating in my middle school and high school, ostensibly to "save the souls" of delinquents and burnouts. One was sort of legit but run by well-meaning but misguided fundies. But another of those groups was the Tony Alamo cult. Along with the brainwashing, they regularly raped and beat the kids who got suckered into joining them. I had friends who got involved with them and helped two of them get out-- they got to a commune some friends of mine were in, and were able to go off-grid for a while. One of them got better, the other had a fatal mishap involving PCP a few years later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Abuse during childhood can also induce PTSD and increase the risk of MAGAt brain. That's why fascists are so fond of child-beating and other authoritarian parenting practices: it brings in new recruits.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago
[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 11 points 1 month ago
[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

That's SBN. C'mon, mate, it's like you're not even trying.

Thanks!

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Oh that was just for other readers. Of course you and I know it’s from the German teurer bescheuerter Irrtum.

Edit: adjective case agreement

[-] Mim@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

It's teurer bescheuerter Irrtum.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI) are a very broad range of injuries involving the brain and central nervous system localized in or around the cranium and cranial cavity referred to as the braincase or brainpan.

For information on medical terms you're unfamiliar with, first cite a medical dictionary such as the Bantam's Medical Dictionary or otherwise TheFreeDictionary.com with the medical dictionary tab selected.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Same happened to my uncle, in his case due to a stroke in the temporo-frontal region when he was in his late 50s. He was a kindhearted man of moderate habits. After the stroke, he went full Mr Hyde, seemingly intent on burning through his retirement in pursuit of cocaine and prostitutes. Luckily for his family, he had another stroke within a year and that was game over.

[-] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 1 month ago
[-] dickalan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have had a couple concussions, and I am generally intolerant of religion as a whole, doesn’t sound like any of the study findings any research on people who weren’t religious to begin with. Unless I’m reading this wrong, which I could be you know, because of the concussions🤣🤣🤣

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago

A link doesn’t mean every single person did - maybe each concussion is rolling a die on the gullible idiot check and you got lucky.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

It also depends on which area of the brain is injured.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Based on what the article said, your general intolerance of religion might be the very symptom they were referencing.

Their research doesn't suggest that damage to that particular area of the brain causes religious beliefs, but rather that it more or less locks you into your beliefs religious or otherwise.

The injured brain becomes less able to consider other viewpoints, so changing beliefs becomes less likely even when confronted with facts that disprove the belief.

[-] dickalan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That’s what I’m thinking, if I was already intolerant of religions, then this just made me even more intolerant of religions, it’s not that hard though to not believe in a magical sky daddy, I wish more people followed my lead

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i think a stroke is more severe than minor concussions. IN A STROKe there actual death of brain cells in the stroke area.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Do you realize that your anecdote is literally meaningless in the context of statistical analysis?

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Do you realize...

Dude started out by mentioning a couple of concussions and ended by stating he might not understand the research because of the concussions, so perhaps the answer is...maybe not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago

There might be a typo, but you said the same thing twice.

[-] ananke@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
573 points (98.8% liked)

politics

24027 readers
1479 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS