621
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 117 points 2 years ago

One dead baby, a tragedy.

Two dead babies, a concern.

Fourteen dead babies, I don't care about her. She's fucked. But what fucking hospital has 14 dead babies? Are you saying you cant identify a pattern after 4 or 5?

The heads of the hospital should be gutted.

Call that place "The dead baby hospital" because wtf.

[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 122 points 2 years ago

Multiple doctors came forward to say that their concerns were ahot down by hospital administrators. They cared more about a bad mark on their record than a someone harming newborns under their watch.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 32 points 2 years ago

Administrators should be gutted in a public square. And let's not stop with these ones.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Are administrators actually going to face any punishment?

[-] egonallanon@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

The senior nurse who was in charge of her was suspended the other day. No idea if any others will face consequences.

[-] y2cwr2005@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Two of the administrators have since retired. One of which decided to bugger off and retire in France.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

She worked in neo natal. That is already "at risk" births. Premature. Addicts. All sorts of things that are risky to begin with. I'm not justifying anything she or the administration did. However it is to be expected at times in those units. Sounds heartless but my family was in those departments for many years.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Okay but the mortality numbers for her unit pretty clearly and obviously pointed to the fact that something was happening here other than the natural deaths one would expect in a NICU

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Absolutely. However it took more time because it's an inherent risk for the unit.

[-] ciaocibai@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 years ago

They said other than when she was working, and before and after she left the number was around or close to 0-2 per year, so pretty obviously an anomaly and certainly worthy of an investigation. The doctors that reported her were punished by the administrators and actually forced to apologise to her so I think they are pretty guilty in the circumstances.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Kill a bunch of babies? Jail forever.

Ignore someone killing babies to keep your £250,000 a year job safe? That's just good neoliberaling.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

How is it liberal, neo or not, dumdum?

[-] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 40 points 2 years ago

@Potatos_are_not_friends @Lanky_Pomegranate530

She murdered 7 babies and attempted to murder 6 others.

Please read the article instead of just the headline.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 28 points 2 years ago
[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 23 points 2 years ago

I know, how do you manage to “attempt” to kill an infant? They aren’t exactly known for being durable.

[-] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

She alternated between giving them insulin, injecting air into their bloodstream, and overfeeding them. The babies that recovered most likely did so either because they weren't in bad shape to begin with, or because they coded while a competent doctor or nurse was on call and able to stabilize them, or because of luck. One of the babies she attempted to kill survived, but has severe cerebral palsy and requires a feeding tube. There's no definitive way to say that the nurse's attempts on her life caused her condition, as she was already a preemie and at risk for multiple complications, but I'd say the lack of durability definitely led to at least some lasting damage for some of the babies that recovered.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What was the purpose of over feeding them?

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

I'm guessing to kill them

[-] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I'm not a doctor so this is me just trying to piece together info from other sources, but it sounds like overfeeding can cause a lot of issues that premature babies aren't developed enough to deal with on their own, like severe gas and bloating. Depending on how delicate the baby is, this might lead to a cascade of problems that are difficult to diagnose, treat, and recover from. With babies that underdeveloped, even something as benign as eating too much can become deadly.

But again, not a doctor, and a quick Google search turned up a bunch of complicated articles that don't really clarify. I just know that it was one of her strategies for worsening the babies' condition.

[-] PickTheStick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Depending on why the infant is in the neonatal unit, specific food can have extremely deleterious effects. Disorders of metabolism are rare, but not as rare as you think, and most are controlled with specific diets. So if she purposely fed the wrong food, and in large amounts, it could absolutely kill certain populations. If an otherwise 'healthy' infant, the most likely cause due to overfeeding would be vomiting, and then aspiration of the vomitus. Infants, especially neonates, are very unlikely to be able to protect their airway. Even if a patient is already on the operating table, survival rates of aspirating vomitus is only 50% or so. That's why you don't eat/drink before surgery, btw.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 11 points 2 years ago

Oh okay it's fine then.

Oh how fucking silly of me that she murdered 7 babies instead of my original number.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Lots of people die in hospitals every day. Even babies. That's why they collect data, in order to see a pattern when it emerges.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Looks like she might have targeted higher risk babies so it's harder to catch, and of course many murders seem to be really good at faking feelings and appearing innocent. One part in the article makes me think all the victims were premature births, and that some of them were especially at risk due to that.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

I'd say deaths in hospital aren't rare. Especially in premature babies where survival could go either way. If you're going to murder babies, a hospital is probably the place where you're going to go unnoticed the longest.

That said, the timeline is pretty damning. Over a decade she'd still be doing it, but this was all in the space of just over a year.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-interactive/2023/aug/18/lucy-letby-timeline-attacks-babies-when-alarm-raised

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
621 points (97.4% liked)

News

36384 readers
822 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS