498
Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/science@lemmy.world
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago

Nutritionally speaking pork is a red meat. All mammal meat is red meat, non mammal meat is not.

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Just checked and you are right. I'm so used to hearing "Pork, the other white meat" that I mis-understood.

[-] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah it was very clever marketing on their part. Don't blame you.

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Next you'll tell me that cat's aren't white meat either....

this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
498 points (97.9% liked)

science

19475 readers
260 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
laverabe@lemmy.zip