498
Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/science@lemmy.world
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

I've had my team of "experts in the obvious" work on this for one and a half minutes and they came to the same conclusion. This is a human greed business issue, not a science one.

[-] DonPiano@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Cool, can you show how big the effect is, based on your team's efforts? And what the distribution of values is, based on sponsor?

this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
498 points (97.9% liked)

science

19475 readers
263 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
laverabe@lemmy.zip