160
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Limonene@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Article doesn't mention my biggest problem with flatpaks, that the packages are not digitally signed. All major Linux distros sign their packages, and flathub should too. I would prefer to see digital signatures from both flathub and the package's maintainer. I don't believe flathub has either one currently.

[-] firelizzard@programming.dev 32 points 1 month ago

It is possible to sign a flatpak, but yeah distributors need to actually do that and flathub should require published flatpaks to be signed.

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
160 points (97.1% liked)

Linux

8334 readers
432 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS