227
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
227 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
59689 readers
1985 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I don't see the problem for Tesla. Regardless of whether the autopilot is active or not, the driver is responsible.
Legally yes, but in my opinion when you market your car as self-driving you do share a certain level of responsibility if it self-drives into an accident.
The driver is fully responsible, but Tesla are also making the big bucks with misleading marketing of how good their driving assistance is. So it's more profitable to keep people unaware of its actual capabilites.
Am I confusing Autopilot and FSD?
There has been little progress in the Autopilot software. Will FSD is much more features rich.
Most mid to high end car manufacturers are making money on L2 driver assistance.
Until they actually aren't:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6Kf3I_OyDlI&pp=ygUYdGVzbGEgc2VsZiBkcml2aW5nIGZhaWwg