41
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
41 points (82.5% liked)
Linux
7815 readers
596 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I've never needed to manually create a start menu entry. I install everything through the default repository or as a flatpak using the default software manager. I did have to manually enable flatpaks in the software manager (point for OP, admittedly).
Everything I've ever installed, including AppImages from time to time, always gets a start menu entry.
Good for you I guess?
Yes, good for me. Good for everybody. Yippee!
No, bad for you for asserting that your experience was universal, and then getting grumpy when someone disagreed and cited their own experience as being different.
No, I said that some important features don't exist. They said "well I don't use them", as if that somehow negated the point that they don't exist. It's typical "works for me" nonsense. You get these replies whenever anyone says anything is suboptimal about Linux. It's so tedious.
Incorrect. You did not just say that some things were "suboptimal" about Linux; your thrust was that Linux offers a "frustrating experience" overall compared to Windows as a result of all of these supposed "paper cuts":