611
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 days ago

I didnt give you the same example. I gave you the context for why your example was the exception and not the rule.

That was an incorrect statement Im not sure why you are throwing a temper tantrum over the fact.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

It's an example of how extreme the rule could be, tone-policing troll. It is unequivocal proof you couldn't just go get a divorce, because the state would almost certainly say, fuck off. Because - in general - by default - it wasn't fucking legal. It was so restricted that zero women in an entire state were granted one, for thirty years, and you think other states granting more than zero means it was easy sailing.

What the fuck else do you think divorce being illegal would look like? What else could those words mean?

If divorce required a tax stamp, would it suddenly click for you?

[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 days ago

i never said it was easy sailing I said it wasn’t illegal and it wasn’t.

You keep trying to move the goalposts sp your claim could have merit and it does not. You could divorce. I know this because several if my ancestors did in the 1800s.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

'Where do you think the goalposts would be, if not where I've consistently planted them?'

'Nuh uh.'

Fuck off.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
611 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

6476 readers
1066 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS