Then you belittled anyone using Flatpaks.

Not a single person including you here was able to show any hint of package maintenance process, QA standard any kind of security awareness.

All I said was that they are not too different. You are right about some OS’s having paid staff who have setup some great QA to handle it though.

And I am saying it's an uneducated statement which fails to back itself miserably.

But, at some point you are "trust me bro"ing someone, paid or not.

Dude... really? Quite a desperate attempt to make an argument. Yes at some point people are just atoms stuck together ... a human being is not different from rock if you twist the point of view enough. This is just you pushing smoke in the room because you have nothing to back up what you are saying. There is a huge difference in trusting blindly and trusting because you have transparency in processes and standards which are followed.

So if flatpak and distro repository is not so different... please show me any published standards or processes that are followed to ensure that flatpak is secure, up to date, without obsolete libraries. Would be cool to see there some transparency. Please show me that I am as secure and stable as while running OpenSuse on my machine at home.