84
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by destructdisc@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

This was a Critical Mass event, which is why the bicyclists are taking up all of the street as a way to reclaim the streets and protest the lack of safety for riders under usual conditions. It's not legal, but protests are never useful if they're fully legal now, are they.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

While she is clearly a dumbass for not just parking and waiting, why is the bike ride taking up all of the lanes in both directions? Was the street blocked off and this lady ignored it?

Why was there an oncoming car in her lane?

This really needs context.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

The OP has some context but Lemmy is bad about showing the text included with a media post so it's easy to miss. The OP states it's a "critical mass" protest where large numbers of cyclists reclaim the street to demand better bicycle infrastructure

[-] destructdisc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I figured that was happening, which is why I updated the title to explicitly state it's a Critical Mass event

[-] regdog@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The context is if the lane ahead of you is blocked you do NOT drive directly into it.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You do ride a bike directly into it though!

The video originally had a vague title and zero context, which is why I asked for some.

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I have no official context. If I had to guess this was some kind of organized night bike event. There were multiple cars on the road so likely not a closed course thing, probably organized only on social media. The car on the wrong side of the road was probably trying to go around the cyclists. The cyclist were likely in the wrong, but as a driver she definitely should have turned off of that street and gone around.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not sure how she could turn off and go around when she has no idea why there is a massive amount of bikes, where they are coming from, or where they are going. Going around requires more information than someone surprised by a massive number of surprise bikes would have.

I'm not opposed to the idea, and I do think just stopping and waiting it out is the best option. She was wrong to just drive forward through the crowd of bikes, but maybe she hoped she would get past the mass of bikes faster?

But expecting someone to 'just go around' is pretty dismissive of someone's confusion when completely surrounded in a situation they don't understand. Like what if she just needed to turn left and go two blocks?

[-] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty easy to just turn the keys and wait... What they did is risking injuring someone. And if you want to take the selfish route, she's putting herself at risk of a large group of now angry people. Turn off the multi ton vehicle and wait. It's not that hard.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes, stopping and waiting it out is what I said she should have done. Someone else said she should have 'just gone around'.

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

The cyclists should pull out guns and shoot the driver in this situation. After all, how can you expect them to do any differently? They suddenly see a driver driving through their parade route, scaring and confusing all of them, endangering all their lives? Sure, they could go around, but we can't judge them harshly if they just kill the driver or set the vehicle on fire.

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

If a bunch of cars did the same thing would you call that a parade?

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's literally what happens in parades.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

So if a bunch of street racers drove in all the lanes you would be fine with it and call it a parade?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Street racing is not a political protest.

Please keep in mind that arguments made in bad faith are uncivil and thus subject to removal under rule 1.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Per the person I was responding to:

It’s called a parade.

They are not engaging with it as a protest, but as a parade, and I am trying to meet them on their terms.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
84 points (86.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

12255 readers
402 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS