29
UK unis to cough up to £10M on Java to keep Oracle off their backs
(www.theregister.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)
Java
1695 readers
2 users here now
For discussing Java, the JVM, languages that run on the JVM, and other related technologies.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I think its will be goes to deeper specific technical & business sides to looking justification to use Oracle Java SE. Its pretty uncommon, but generally, most of us here just developing application and/or backend for commercial implementation, and didn't require much deeper technical things, like using other JDK's than Oracle Java SE is still handling good in most of our cases.
If you pay to Bellsoft or Azul, I think you'll pay for commercial support from them, like if you running company and using much Java in productions, implementing Java in mass scale, and/or enterprise support, and really need or require support system from Bellsoft/Azul.
*cmiiw
I agree. The main reason to pay Oracle or any other JDK provider is to get support and patches. There are also specific use cases such as performance considerations where commercial JVMs may have low level optimizations that may be beneficial in certain use cases.
But for general development, even on enterprise level, you'd be fine with regular community editions of OpenJDK. In fact I don't know of anyone who pays for commercial JDKs.
My main gripe is with Oracle, whose business model regarding Java is just scummy in general. If you use Oracle JDK and they come knocking, you deserve whatever happens to you. Google learned this lesson the hard way, we should learn from their experience.