953
Anon likes trains (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wouldn't be carbon neutral.

/dollar is a fantasy bullshit metric. Joules portable per joule in, joules per weight, joules per area, chemical byproducts per joule, fancy gear and maintenance required. those are what actually matter in the real world. We cannot afford to keep fucking around with childish LARP shit like money.

And the best tool we have for carbon capture is still just trees. No process is perfectly efficient, can't be, and all have collateral costs.

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it.

In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
953 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

6540 readers
647 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS