314
submitted 8 months ago by CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 83 points 8 months ago

All those morons who voted for trump hope you enjoy being even more broke for the next decade and your sons going to war to die so rich cunts can get richer

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

good thing I stoped giving a shit if their kids die.

[-] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Guess I'm dead. Good riddance.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Of course with the exception of those who know their parents are shit

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

As if this only started under Trump...

[-] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago

Him pouring gasoline on the fire sure as shit didn't help.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -5 points 8 months ago

Not did it help when Biden did, what's your point?

[-] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Biden was not nearly critical enough towards Israel, he did not stop supplying them with weapons, but it seemed like he was at least not happy with what Netanyahu is doing. Trump, on the other hand, is very clear in his explicit approval and practically daring Israel to do more. There is a difference.

Both are bad, both are wrong, but even you have to be able to see that one option is worse than the other.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

but it seemed like

Pure vibes based politics

The fan fiction you've written in your head to justify your teams support of genocide does not actually make a real difference.

In the real world, the one where facts matter, Biden was full throated and active in his support of Israel, to the point of going up and repeating lies about beheaded babies.

but even you have to be able to see that one option is worse than the other.

It's telling that even you cannot justify the actual actions of the Biden administration, so you have to make up your own fantasy version to defend them.

The only difference between Trump and Biden on Israel is that, under Trump, liberals like you stop engaging in mass genocide denialism to defend their team.

[-] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

Don't blame it just on trump voters, any cents you ever paid to the government also went into this.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

This is one of those cases where both sides really are the same.

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Iran is a paper tiger. A war of that scale can only be fought if the other side has the capabilities to fight back, Iran does not.

[-] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world -1 points 8 months ago

So much of a paper tiger that thry need support for all the west

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

What has Iran done that actually constitutes a proportional response? Every time they get humiliated by Israel, they shoot a bunch of empty missles and then claim that they destroyed Tel Aviv, even though more than 90% of their missles don't hit anything.

[-] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world -2 points 8 months ago

Videos show the opposite of what you claim

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

What videos? Besides we're going off of assessed damage. Israel kills Haniyeh in Tehran and Iran shoots a bunch of empty missles that barely hit anything. Israel kills 20+ of their top commanders in one night and Iran again shoots a bunch of empty missles that barely hit anything. Israel neuters Hezbollah, Iran does nothing. Israel bombs the Iranian embassy in Syria, and Iran does nothing. Mossad agents have been confirmed being literally everywhere in the Iranian state, and they do nothing.

Iran hasn't done any percesion strikes or targeted assassinations or caused any damage to Israeli defenses or destroyed any critical Israeli infrastructure or any covert intelligence operations. They've done nothing because they can't do anything. The Iranian regime literally made destroying Israel a core part of their identity, and over the past few years, Israel has been destroying them without any pushback. For a regime that brags about their prowess and capabilities, why haven't they used them already? The answer is simple, Iran is a paper tiger.

[-] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world -2 points 8 months ago

Videos of israeli filming the damage despite israel trying to censor them. There is already dozens of reported injured israelis.

The real plan is to do a regime change it won't happen

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Are you hearing yourself? You sound ridiculous.

Results of Israel's attacks:

  • 20+ of the IRGC's top commanders

  • Invaluable nuclear scientists

  • Military systems sabatoged

  • Nuclear facilities damaged

  • Airfields and other critical infrastructure damaged

Results of Iran's retaliation:

  • A couple dozen Israeli civilian injuries

  • A few damaged buildings

These are not at all comparable. Clearly did way more damage to the Iranian regime, and Iran's response is undeniably weaker.

[-] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Again winning is based on objectives. Israel will never reach it objective of a regime change unless there is a ground operation of multiple years. Similar on how hizbollah was considered the winner despite israel have significally less casualities in 2006.

It's not the first time iran lost scientists and top leaders

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/damage-iranian-nuclear-sites-so-far-appears-limited-experts-say-2025-06-13/

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Israel's objective isn't regime change. They would welcome a regime change, but that has never been the objective. The actual objective has been to dismantle Iran's ability to project power. This means stopping them from getting nukes, having a capable military, and having reliable proxies. They've been doing a good job doing all of this over the past few years, and this attack is another example.

On the other hand, Iran's explicitly stated objective is to destroy Israel... And they haven't done a thing to get anywhere near that.

You're simply being dishonest by trying to pretend that Iran is somehow keeping up or exceeding Israel in their back and forth when they're very clearly and objectively not.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
314 points (96.7% liked)

News

36384 readers
870 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS